Re: 《经济评论》第三期 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Economics - 经济

Re: 《经济评论》第三期

Re: 《经济评论》第三期# Economics - 经济

l*a2004-01-27 08:01

1 楼

my conjectures is that gov't (railroad in this case) charges a low price, this
will lead to excess demand. then they can sell tickets to HuangNiu and profit from
this. Lots of gov't branches still do this, i believe.
is there a solution to it? sure. deregulate the industry more, let the mkt
run more efficiently, more money will go in,which in turn will lead to
increased capacity. but will the gov't do that? hell no.
btw, good articles you ahve there.

t*e2004-01-27 08:01

2 楼

Here's a response from a friend and my re-response. Hope it will answer part
of your question and initiate more debates.
>> good work, although I don't totally agree on your point of view.
>>
>> 1. which welfare function you are using to maximize social welfare?
I don't try to maximize any social welfare function, instead, I compare
the loss in the money metric utility, by which I mean social wealth, in
queing, with the non-positive loss in pure market exchange. In fact, we
know that in market e

t*e2004-01-27 08:01

3 楼

Thank you for your reading!
Any deregulation necessitates strong political nerves like those of Deng or
Thatcher. But for the deregulation works for our transportation sector, the
government has to do much more than than the mere deregulation or
privatization of railroads and airways. One thing I care most is the
immigration of farmers into cities. MinGong have to be treated equally in
cities. If the government can make it, the demand for transportation during
holidays will become much more elas

【在 l**a 的大作中提到】

: my conjectures is that gov't (railroad in this case) charges a low price, this
: will lead to excess demand. then they can sell tickets to HuangNiu and profit from
: this. Lots of gov't branches still do this, i believe.
: is there a solution to it? sure. deregulate the industry more, let the mkt
: run more efficiently, more money will go in,which in turn will lead to
: increased capacity. but will the gov't do that? hell no.
: btw, good articles you ahve there.

l*a2004-01-27 08:01

4 楼

we are talking aboutdifferent sides of the story: you are talking about
reducing the demand by treating those temporary workers fairly so more
of them will stay in the city during hte peak time; i refered to the case
where there is a fixed demand, how should you supply efficiently.

【在 t*****e 的大作中提到】

: Thank you for your reading!
: Any deregulation necessitates strong political nerves like those of Deng or
: Thatcher. But for the deregulation works for our transportation sector, the
: government has to do much more than than the mere deregulation or
: privatization of railroads and airways. One thing I care most is the
: immigration of farmers into cities. MinGong have to be treated equally in
: cities. If the government can make it, the demand for transportation during
: holidays will become much more elas