情人节生意经# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
l*i
1 楼
这个清华高材生,哈佛薄后 虽然满足3条,但被推荐人的牛背景给毁掉了.唉,可惜!
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
In this case, the petitioner has submitted evidence that qualifies under three of the evidentiary criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(h)(3).
when compared to his esteemed references, it appears that the highest level
of the petitioner's field is far above the level he has attained. In stark
contrast to his references, the petitioner has not established that his
achievements are commensurate with sustained national or international
acclaim in the biomedical research field, or being among that small
percentage at the very top of the field of
endeavor.
这是 他的推荐人背景:
In contrast, d states: "I have written more than 80 papers that have been published in leading peer-reviewed scientific journals. Other publications include 30 reviews, chapters and
editorials and a chapter in the most widely-used textbook for medical students, in ~eura1,Science."
curriculum vitae more than 121 journal articles. The petitioner's research supervisor, he "has published 137 papers in high impact peer-reviewed journals." Moreover, states: "Over the course of my career, I
have published at least 135 peer-reviewed papers in such leading journals as Cell, Science, and
Nature." Finally, states: "I have well over 300 publications to my name, including
research papers, reviews, and book chapters."
这个只是一个判例,继续研读发现好多判例都是和推荐人比较,然后说"好像差别有点大
啊."
看这个:
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
Many of the petitioner's references' credentials are far more impressive than those of the petitioner
While the petitioner need not demonstrate that there is no one more accomplished than herself to
qualify for the classification sought, it appears that the very top of her field of endeavor is far above
the level she has attained. In this case, the petitioner has not established that her achievements at the
time of filing were commensurate with sustained national or international acclaim as a research
scientist, or being among that small percentage at the very top of the field of endeavor
还有这个:
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
many of the petitioner's references' credentials are far more impressive than those of the petitioner
这个:
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
We note that the petitioner's references' credentials are more impressive.
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
We note that the petitioner's references' credentials are far more impressive. For example
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
A review of the docurricntary c\itlellc.e rcllccr\
that tlie pc~itioncrs ubmitted 24 scholarly articles that were published at the lime ol' tlic filinz of
the petition. However. when compared to the authorship of the petitioner's rcI'crcncc\. i t ;~l?[?c;~rs
that his rcfcrc~iccsa re lar above the accomplishments of the petitioner.
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
In this case, the petitioner has submitted evidence that qualifies under three of the evidentiary criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(h)(3).
when compared to his esteemed references, it appears that the highest level
of the petitioner's field is far above the level he has attained. In stark
contrast to his references, the petitioner has not established that his
achievements are commensurate with sustained national or international
acclaim in the biomedical research field, or being among that small
percentage at the very top of the field of
endeavor.
这是 他的推荐人背景:
In contrast, d states: "I have written more than 80 papers that have been published in leading peer-reviewed scientific journals. Other publications include 30 reviews, chapters and
editorials and a chapter in the most widely-used textbook for medical students, in ~eura1,Science."
curriculum vitae more than 121 journal articles. The petitioner's research supervisor, he "has published 137 papers in high impact peer-reviewed journals." Moreover, states: "Over the course of my career, I
have published at least 135 peer-reviewed papers in such leading journals as Cell, Science, and
Nature." Finally, states: "I have well over 300 publications to my name, including
research papers, reviews, and book chapters."
这个只是一个判例,继续研读发现好多判例都是和推荐人比较,然后说"好像差别有点大
啊."
看这个:
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
Many of the petitioner's references' credentials are far more impressive than those of the petitioner
While the petitioner need not demonstrate that there is no one more accomplished than herself to
qualify for the classification sought, it appears that the very top of her field of endeavor is far above
the level she has attained. In this case, the petitioner has not established that her achievements at the
time of filing were commensurate with sustained national or international acclaim as a research
scientist, or being among that small percentage at the very top of the field of endeavor
还有这个:
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
many of the petitioner's references' credentials are far more impressive than those of the petitioner
这个:
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
We note that the petitioner's references' credentials are more impressive.
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
We note that the petitioner's references' credentials are far more impressive. For example
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
A review of the docurricntary c\itlellc.e rcllccr\
that tlie pc~itioncrs ubmitted 24 scholarly articles that were published at the lime ol' tlic filinz of
the petition. However. when compared to the authorship of the petitioner's rcI'crcncc\. i t ;~l?[?c;~rs
that his rcfcrc~iccsa re lar above the accomplishments of the petitioner.
