avatar
X100 vs. X100s 高感 skin# PhotoGear - 摄影器材
k*a
1
both cameras are set to F5.6, 1/60s, ISO3200, ASTIA, NR:-2, all others:
default
X100 vs. X100S -- see the attached 100% crop pics.
Looks like X100S's pic is applied with certain NR already even w/ NR=-2 --
though I won't call it waxy. Interestingly, the detail is better kept
compared to X100, e.g., the hairs and cloth etc.
the pic in the other thread seems over cooked -- I have seen that kind of
effect in LR if people set the NR to very high.
avatar
r*j
2
X-trans Cmos都这样
avatar
y*e
3
光线情况不一样,不能比啊

【在 k********a 的大作中提到】
: both cameras are set to F5.6, 1/60s, ISO3200, ASTIA, NR:-2, all others:
: default
: X100 vs. X100S -- see the attached 100% crop pics.
: Looks like X100S's pic is applied with certain NR already even w/ NR=-2 --
: though I won't call it waxy. Interestingly, the detail is better kept
: compared to X100, e.g., the hairs and cloth etc.
: the pic in the other thread seems over cooked -- I have seen that kind of
: effect in LR if people set the NR to very high.

avatar
k*a
4
网上X100 vs X100S 高感对比已经很多了,这里主要是show一下高感下皮肤是否waxy。
回头再贴一些不同NR下的对比。

【在 y*********e 的大作中提到】
: 光线情况不一样,不能比啊
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。