未来不会有1,2种语言获得统治地位了, java, c, c++ 这种统治地位的语言,再也不会出现了。 以后就是百家争鸣。 go也就是几十种可用语言的之一。
h*y
28 楼
你决定从了这个offer吗 还是在等更好的呢
【在 p*****r 的大作中提到】 : Lewis Cantley应该是拿诺奖的料,就看时间了。Padolf lab也刚搬来没多 : 旧,不知道发展如何。
d*i
29 楼
这个recruiter就是在哄骗小孩,I can tell you non of them will be so called 21 世纪的xxx, all the current main-stream languages C, C++, Java, JavaScript .. . etc will be there forever. Among them, C is especially unreplacable and dominant in its field. There is no chance that new language will be like that. New languages are more like 陪客 or 匆匆过客。
And a vague statement as well. Totally non-repeatable or partially non-repeatable? They are very different.
【在 n********k 的大作中提到】 : that's really a strong statement, is it just overheard or actually one : working in the field and knows?
l*u
37 楼
PI3K pathway 能拿诺奖吗?
【在 p*****r 的大作中提到】 : Lewis Cantley应该是拿诺奖的料,就看时间了。Padolf lab也刚搬来没多 : 旧,不知道发展如何。
n*k
38 楼
well, you are arguing now:))) but do have a point I have to say...
【在 p*f 的大作中提到】 : And a vague statement as well. Totally non-repeatable or partially : non-repeatable? They are very different.
T*G
39 楼
I interviewed in his lab a few years ago, many european postdocs, he is smart and definitely know how to wrap up a story from sth or even almost nothing, has sharp eyes, paper machine type. But pressure is high, he is Italian I guess, most people need to have fellowship within a year of postdoc. some techs are very arrogant since they have been there for a while. Not all people are doing well in the lab. Some results are highly doubted in he field. If you have your own money and idea, a great pl
【在 T*G 的大作中提到】 : I interviewed in his lab a few years ago, many european postdocs, he is : smart and definitely know how to wrap : up a story from sth or even almost nothing, has sharp eyes, paper machine : type. But pressure is high, he is : Italian I guess, most people need to have fellowship within a year of : postdoc. some techs are very arrogant : since they have been there for a while. Not all people are doing well in the : lab. Some results are highly : doubted in he field. If you have your own money and idea, a great pl
l*k
41 楼
I heard that from a friend who has repeated some of PPP lab's work. He is a good at experiment and very smart. He heard the same thing from other ones, too.
【在 n********k 的大作中提到】 : that's really a strong statement, is it just overheard or actually one : working in the field and knows?
l*k
42 楼
Most of the time, one nonrepaetable experiment would be good enough to trash the whole paper because all the arguements made in one paper are interlinked!
【在 p*f 的大作中提到】 : And a vague statement as well. Totally non-repeatable or partially : non-repeatable? They are very different.
p*f
43 楼
I wouldn't make such extreme claims. For some papers, you just need to look at their real data/figures and ignore their conclusions.
trash
【在 l*******k 的大作中提到】 : Most of the time, one nonrepaetable experiment would be good enough to trash : the whole paper because all the arguements made in one paper are : interlinked!
c*l
44 楼
I do not like PPP himself or his papers either. Sometimes they seem to be manipulated, not falsified though. I just wonder how could he keep watering in such high-impact journals with "bad reputation".
x*g
45 楼
Nod. Don't like either his personality or his publications. He can do this bcz he schmooze with journal editors...
watering
【在 c****l 的大作中提到】 : I do not like PPP himself or his papers either. Sometimes they seem to be : manipulated, not falsified though. I just wonder how could he keep watering : in such high-impact journals with "bad reputation".
windysea I heard that she told the people of one institution she interviewed with that she had more than 10 interviews. What a shameless bxxxx.
w*2
49 楼
It's not a fair word. there is NO solid evidence that she manipulated her cell paper. But her nature paper about the role of a miRNA in cancer metastasis may be an artifact that does not happen in cancer patients.
【在 l*******k 的大作中提到】 : windysea : I heard that she told the people of one institution she interviewed with : that she had more than 10 interviews. What a shameless bxxxx.
m*r
50 楼
In her G&D paper, there is a solid patch.
n*k
51 楼
Wow, u rock now...nonetheless, anything really wrong with that...BTW, I was pretty curious about what might make one use such strong word on a stranger(?)...
【在 l*******k 的大作中提到】 : windysea : I heard that she told the people of one institution she interviewed with : that she had more than 10 interviews. What a shameless bxxxx.
l*k
52 楼
I do not know windysea personally. I just do not like the way she behaves.
was
【在 n********k 的大作中提到】 : Wow, u rock now...nonetheless, anything really wrong with that...BTW, I was : pretty curious about what might : make one use such strong word on a stranger(?)...
l*k
53 楼
And i do not like the fact the positions and resources are taken and controlled by the persons like her and her advisor.
was
【在 n********k 的大作中提到】 : Wow, u rock now...nonetheless, anything really wrong with that...BTW, I was : pretty curious about what might : make one use such strong word on a stranger(?)...
h*y
54 楼
just be curious about which offer she will take?
【在 l*******k 的大作中提到】 : I do not know windysea personally. I just do not like the way she behaves. : : was
h*y
55 楼
should be Nature Cell Biology paper?
【在 w*******2 的大作中提到】 : It's not a fair word. : there is NO solid evidence that she manipulated her cell paper. : But her nature paper about the role of a miRNA in cancer metastasis : may be an artifact that does not happen in cancer patients.
l*k
56 楼
you mean she?
【在 h******y 的大作中提到】 : just be curious about which offer she will take?
h*y
57 楼
sorry...yes..she
【在 l*******k 的大作中提到】 : you mean she?
l*u
58 楼
the miRNA is mir-10b? if yes, I know who she is.
【在 w*******2 的大作中提到】 : It's not a fair word. : there is NO solid evidence that she manipulated her cell paper. : But her nature paper about the role of a miRNA in cancer metastasis : may be an artifact that does not happen in cancer patients.
yes miR-10b. I have not read that paper yet, so I don't comment on that paper. But with 4 years of research in miR in cancer and with 2 papers published ( sorry, not CNS), I deeply feel that miR field has so much trash. The profiling is very mature and easy to run, however, most of the functional experiments in most of papers are based on artifact and even error. The miR -mRNA interaction is so complex and unclear yet, and the miR target validation experiments in most paper are bullshit. I am
【在 l******u 的大作中提到】 : the miRNA is mir-10b? if yes, I know who she is.
l*u
61 楼
can not agree more, I just finished the microRNA array from laser microdissected patient tissue samples, actually, there is a very promising candidate about tumor and host tissue interaction, but I don wanna go for functional study and just gona publish it.
miR
【在 h********n 的大作中提到】 : yes miR-10b. : I have not read that paper yet, so I don't comment on that paper. : But with 4 years of research in miR in cancer and with 2 papers published ( : sorry, not CNS), I deeply feel that miR field has so much trash. The : profiling is very mature and easy to run, however, most of the functional : experiments in most of papers are based on artifact and even error. The miR : -mRNA interaction is so complex and unclear yet, and the miR target : validation experiments in most paper are bullshit. : I am