s*y
2 楼
马上要做个试验,用到DRAQ5, 老板专门强调要注意保护,尤其是young woman,听着心
里怕怕的,会不会有潜在遗传毒性?
里怕怕的,会不会有潜在遗传毒性?
M*e
3 楼
嗯,我的意思是可不可以直接把自己发表的paper的intro部分拿来直接用在博士论文的
intro里面呢?
intro里面呢?
s*y
4 楼
自己支持一下,希望用过的女同胞给点建议。
h*n
6 楼
as long as you don't eat or directly touch the dye, it is fine.
w*y
7 楼
of course you can.
a*u
10 楼
I don't know where you got this idea from.
Usually in the copyright statement of journal papers, there is an explicit
statement saying the published paper can be included in PhD dissertations
without the journal's permission.
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: No.
: Your doctoral dissertation is supposed to be UNPUBLISHED.
: You may cite your previous papers, but you can not just cut and paste
: part of your previous publications.
Usually in the copyright statement of journal papers, there is an explicit
statement saying the published paper can be included in PhD dissertations
without the journal's permission.
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: No.
: Your doctoral dissertation is supposed to be UNPUBLISHED.
: You may cite your previous papers, but you can not just cut and paste
: part of your previous publications.
p*x
13 楼
"can be included",
I don't think you can "cut and paste".
I think you need to "cite yourself".
【在 a********u 的大作中提到】
: I don't know where you got this idea from.
: Usually in the copyright statement of journal papers, there is an explicit
: statement saying the published paper can be included in PhD dissertations
: without the journal's permission.
I don't think you can "cut and paste".
I think you need to "cite yourself".
【在 a********u 的大作中提到】
: I don't know where you got this idea from.
: Usually in the copyright statement of journal papers, there is an explicit
: statement saying the published paper can be included in PhD dissertations
: without the journal's permission.
a*u
16 楼
怎么会有发表过的不让用这种规定的。。。
那叫人怎么混,临毕业了突然再做篇200页的新东西出来?
那叫人怎么混,临毕业了突然再做篇200页的新东西出来?
l*e
18 楼
你太搞笑了,一般只要给journal要一个permission for reuse of article就可以了,
一般杂志都会给这个permission,可以原文一字不差放在dissertation里,自己搞不清
楚还是别误导要毕业的同志
I don't think you can cut and paste.You need to cite yourself.You may
doublecheck with y........
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.26
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: I don't think you can cut and paste.
: You need to cite yourself.
: You may doublecheck with your advisor.
一般杂志都会给这个permission,可以原文一字不差放在dissertation里,自己搞不清
楚还是别误导要毕业的同志
I don't think you can cut and paste.You need to cite yourself.You may
doublecheck with y........
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.26
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: I don't think you can cut and paste.
: You need to cite yourself.
: You may doublecheck with your advisor.
M*n
21 楼
as far as I know "yes, you can"
F*n
22 楼
You can ask the permission from the journal which you initially published
the paper. The journal will be happy to grant you the rights.
the paper. The journal will be happy to grant you the rights.
p*x
24 楼
I think "can be included" means you can cite yourself by paraphrasing it
and add in-text citation(e.g., Zhang, 2009).
It does not mean that you can not use your own publications.
It is just that you need to paraphrase it instead of "cut and paste".
But you might need to doublecheck with your advisor who is the boss in this
regard.
【在 a*****u 的大作中提到】
: 怎么会有发表过的不让用这种规定的。。。
: 那叫人怎么混,临毕业了突然再做篇200页的新东西出来?
and add in-text citation(e.g., Zhang, 2009).
It does not mean that you can not use your own publications.
It is just that you need to paraphrase it instead of "cut and paste".
But you might need to doublecheck with your advisor who is the boss in this
regard.
【在 a*****u 的大作中提到】
: 怎么会有发表过的不让用这种规定的。。。
: 那叫人怎么混,临毕业了突然再做篇200页的新东西出来?
w*y
26 楼
这个是自己猜的?象这样的事情为什么自己都没有搞懂,就瞎说?
问两个问题,为什么不能直接用?palagerism? 难道rephrase it就不是了?
这个版上很多人自己就是advisors。问谁!?
this
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: I think "can be included" means you can cite yourself by paraphrasing it
: and add in-text citation(e.g., Zhang, 2009).
: It does not mean that you can not use your own publications.
: It is just that you need to paraphrase it instead of "cut and paste".
: But you might need to doublecheck with your advisor who is the boss in this
: regard.
问两个问题,为什么不能直接用?palagerism? 难道rephrase it就不是了?
这个版上很多人自己就是advisors。问谁!?
this
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: I think "can be included" means you can cite yourself by paraphrasing it
: and add in-text citation(e.g., Zhang, 2009).
: It does not mean that you can not use your own publications.
: It is just that you need to paraphrase it instead of "cut and paste".
: But you might need to doublecheck with your advisor who is the boss in this
: regard.
a*u
27 楼
The following citation should be able to close the debate, at least for IOP
journals (e.g., Nanotechnology).
"After the copyright in my article has transferred to IOP, may I still use
the article for teaching or in a thesis or dissertation?
Yes, the Assignment of Copyright document sets out the rights that IOP
authors retain in clause 3. These include copying the article (all or part)
for teaching purposes, and including the article (all or part) in research
theses or dissertations. These rights must be exercised for non-commercial
purposes. If possible citation information and IOP’s copyright notice
should be displayed and for electronic use best efforts must be made to
include a link to the online abstract in the journal."
How to find this paragraph?
-Go to http://iopscience.iop.org/0957-4484/
-Click "Authors"
-Click "Copyright FAQs"
I don't think "include" here means "rephrase."
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: I think "can be included" means you can cite yourself by paraphrasing it
: and add in-text citation(e.g., Zhang, 2009).
: It does not mean that you can not use your own publications.
: It is just that you need to paraphrase it instead of "cut and paste".
: But you might need to doublecheck with your advisor who is the boss in this
: regard.
journals (e.g., Nanotechnology).
"After the copyright in my article has transferred to IOP, may I still use
the article for teaching or in a thesis or dissertation?
Yes, the Assignment of Copyright document sets out the rights that IOP
authors retain in clause 3. These include copying the article (all or part)
for teaching purposes, and including the article (all or part) in research
theses or dissertations. These rights must be exercised for non-commercial
purposes. If possible citation information and IOP’s copyright notice
should be displayed and for electronic use best efforts must be made to
include a link to the online abstract in the journal."
How to find this paragraph?
-Go to http://iopscience.iop.org/0957-4484/
-Click "Authors"
-Click "Copyright FAQs"
I don't think "include" here means "rephrase."
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: I think "can be included" means you can cite yourself by paraphrasing it
: and add in-text citation(e.g., Zhang, 2009).
: It does not mean that you can not use your own publications.
: It is just that you need to paraphrase it instead of "cut and paste".
: But you might need to doublecheck with your advisor who is the boss in this
: regard.
p*x
28 楼
Just for your information.
You may use your published article without violating the copy right rules.
But you need to USE IT properly.
That is to say, you need to "paraphrase it" and CITE yourself (e.g. Zhang,
2009).
This is based on my own experience.
I published a paper in 2008 and I wanted to copy and paste part of it
in another paper in 2010.
I was told by the journal editor that I need to paraphrase it and cite
myself.
Maybe it is totally different in your field or your school.
I don't know about that.
Thats why you need to ask your own advisor.
IOP
)
【在 a********u 的大作中提到】
: The following citation should be able to close the debate, at least for IOP
: journals (e.g., Nanotechnology).
: "After the copyright in my article has transferred to IOP, may I still use
: the article for teaching or in a thesis or dissertation?
: Yes, the Assignment of Copyright document sets out the rights that IOP
: authors retain in clause 3. These include copying the article (all or part)
: for teaching purposes, and including the article (all or part) in research
: theses or dissertations. These rights must be exercised for non-commercial
: purposes. If possible citation information and IOP’s copyright notice
: should be displayed and for electronic use best efforts must be made to
You may use your published article without violating the copy right rules.
But you need to USE IT properly.
That is to say, you need to "paraphrase it" and CITE yourself (e.g. Zhang,
2009).
This is based on my own experience.
I published a paper in 2008 and I wanted to copy and paste part of it
in another paper in 2010.
I was told by the journal editor that I need to paraphrase it and cite
myself.
Maybe it is totally different in your field or your school.
I don't know about that.
Thats why you need to ask your own advisor.
IOP
)
【在 a********u 的大作中提到】
: The following citation should be able to close the debate, at least for IOP
: journals (e.g., Nanotechnology).
: "After the copyright in my article has transferred to IOP, may I still use
: the article for teaching or in a thesis or dissertation?
: Yes, the Assignment of Copyright document sets out the rights that IOP
: authors retain in clause 3. These include copying the article (all or part)
: for teaching purposes, and including the article (all or part) in research
: theses or dissertations. These rights must be exercised for non-commercial
: purposes. If possible citation information and IOP’s copyright notice
: should be displayed and for electronic use best efforts must be made to
gr
29 楼
你情况跟大家不同吧。
你这是两篇journal,自然不能复制黏贴了。
大家关注的是journal变dissertation
use
part
research
commercial
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: Just for your information.
: You may use your published article without violating the copy right rules.
: But you need to USE IT properly.
: That is to say, you need to "paraphrase it" and CITE yourself (e.g. Zhang,
: 2009).
: This is based on my own experience.
: I published a paper in 2008 and I wanted to copy and paste part of it
: in another paper in 2010.
: I was told by the journal editor that I need to paraphrase it and cite
: myself.
你这是两篇journal,自然不能复制黏贴了。
大家关注的是journal变dissertation
use
part
research
commercial
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: Just for your information.
: You may use your published article without violating the copy right rules.
: But you need to USE IT properly.
: That is to say, you need to "paraphrase it" and CITE yourself (e.g. Zhang,
: 2009).
: This is based on my own experience.
: I published a paper in 2008 and I wanted to copy and paste part of it
: in another paper in 2010.
: I was told by the journal editor that I need to paraphrase it and cite
: myself.
c*3
30 楼
有两种dissertation吧。
一种是传统意义上的。直接从journal照搬到dissertation是不允许的,是自我抄袭。
第二种portfolio形式的dissertation, 其实就是将自己在journal发表的文章,放在一
起 (串在一起),需要写点Intro之类的,如果和别人一起发表的文章,要说明那些自
己完成;最后写个总结什么的。不过不是每一个学校都接受第二种。
一种是传统意义上的。直接从journal照搬到dissertation是不允许的,是自我抄袭。
第二种portfolio形式的dissertation, 其实就是将自己在journal发表的文章,放在一
起 (串在一起),需要写点Intro之类的,如果和别人一起发表的文章,要说明那些自
己完成;最后写个总结什么的。不过不是每一个学校都接受第二种。
p*x
32 楼
This makes sense.
1. "直接从journal照搬到dissertation是不允许的,是自我抄袭"
2. "不是每一个学校都接受第二种
portfolio形式的dissertation"
【在 c*********3 的大作中提到】
: 有两种dissertation吧。
: 一种是传统意义上的。直接从journal照搬到dissertation是不允许的,是自我抄袭。
: 第二种portfolio形式的dissertation, 其实就是将自己在journal发表的文章,放在一
: 起 (串在一起),需要写点Intro之类的,如果和别人一起发表的文章,要说明那些自
: 己完成;最后写个总结什么的。不过不是每一个学校都接受第二种。
1. "直接从journal照搬到dissertation是不允许的,是自我抄袭"
2. "不是每一个学校都接受第二种
portfolio形式的dissertation"
【在 c*********3 的大作中提到】
: 有两种dissertation吧。
: 一种是传统意义上的。直接从journal照搬到dissertation是不允许的,是自我抄袭。
: 第二种portfolio形式的dissertation, 其实就是将自己在journal发表的文章,放在一
: 起 (串在一起),需要写点Intro之类的,如果和别人一起发表的文章,要说明那些自
: 己完成;最后写个总结什么的。不过不是每一个学校都接受第二种。
m*g
33 楼
很简单,问你们大学研究生院啊。 根据我了解的情况,美国绝大部分学校不能直接考
,要做修改,而且把引用标明。欧洲大部分学校是,面前致谢 ,然后literature
review,最后把自己的文章题目列出来,具体标明每篇文章的贡献,最后直接贴文章。
,要做修改,而且把引用标明。欧洲大部分学校是,面前致谢 ,然后literature
review,最后把自己的文章题目列出来,具体标明每篇文章的贡献,最后直接贴文章。
相关阅读
跪求推荐一个好用的CamKII antibodyhuman 18s rDNA要闭关了生物体系本身的问题dna如何检测曹雪芹是曹操后裔觉得生物学家都应该学习一下吴健雄的精神最近发现自己是ADD患者碰到一个国内来的访问学者 (转载)耶鲁的Joseph Schlessinger很牛啊求审稿机会芝加哥大学的HHMI教授Harinder Singh实验室关闭了?我的5M NaCl怎么溶不了?与前实验室关系paper help, Thanks关于phd学生自己申请额外funding怎么分析real time 数据啊?南京大学miRNA理论颠覆转基因安全神话,引世界轰动! 核心提示(转载)什么是好idea,什么是cheap idea请教挑选学校想从水稻(Oryza sativa)里克隆个基因,求助