Single cell is the selling point. Where is their mechanistic study? Anyway, you don't need mechanism to publish on high-profile journals, if you are doing fancy stuff.
v*o
18 楼
多谢! 查高压线辐射的。
【在 g*****9 的大作中提到】 : : What kind of radiation are you checking? : Ionizing radiation include: : Alpha radiation : Beta(+/-) radiation : Gamma radiation : Non-ionizing radiation include: : Neutron radiation : Electromagnetic radiation : Light radiation
Mechanistic study is just a subset of biomedical research.
you
【在 y******8 的大作中提到】 : Single cell is the selling point. : Where is their mechanistic study? : Anyway, you don't need mechanism to publish on high-profile journals, if you : are doing fancy stuff.
【在 p*****c 的大作中提到】 : 按第一作者:9篇第一作者是中国人,还有一篇是华人(Man Yan Wong),一篇是韩国 : 人Ju Young Kim,总共亚裔11/15 : 按第一单位:中国大陆的3篇,其中王军自己两篇 : 按通讯作者:中国人4篇,除了中国大陆的3篇,还有明国立和宋红军夫妇1篇 : 这趋势,中国人也会把生物搞成夕阳产业啊。。。
g*9
30 楼
If you buy a good continuous radon monitor, you can check yourself. Most good meter also let you download the result to computer. Make sure you follow the instructions to calibrate the meter and set up a proper height from the ground, etc.
【在 v***o 的大作中提到】 : 太谢谢了! : 关于radon gas ,是直接拿着continuous radon monitor / radon gas detector自己 : 去测,还是可以让inspector查?
The efficiency of single cell amplification of those two papers is ridiculously high. many people used the same kit, never got this good coverage. The two paper will be under scrutiny. I have heard about bad comments about BGI. We have to wait and see.
【在 o*****r 的大作中提到】 : The efficiency of single cell amplification of those two papers is : ridiculously high. : many people used the same kit, never got this good coverage. : The two paper will be under scrutiny. I have heard about bad comments about BGI. : We have to wait and see.
o*r
46 楼
I guess that you have no idea about how science community works. Not every people knows about the details of your work. But every people can hear about your reputations. If the claim cannot be repeated, not only will their work be trashed, but also their service will be doubted. considering BGI is a symbol of "big-science" in china, it will be detrimental to the whole chinese science community.
起!
【在 l*****2 的大作中提到】 : 不管怎么说,一流的paper国人比重越来越大确实是事实,还是值得高兴的事情。顶起! : : about BGI.
t*s
47 楼
好自为之吧>>>>
y*8
48 楼
Easy. Science is never meant to be big. Otherwise, it is called engineering. And engineering people are usually better paid.
can
【在 o*****r 的大作中提到】 : I guess that you have no idea about how science community works. : Not every people knows about the details of your work. But every people can : hear about your reputations. : If the claim cannot be repeated, not only will their work be trashed, but : also their service will be doubted. : considering BGI is a symbol of "big-science" in china, it will be : detrimental to the whole chinese science community. : : 起!
o*r
49 楼
还好吧。只是觉着前面的观点太狭隘。需要泼些冷水。 Agree with u on comments about "big-science". That is the reason I quoted it.
engineering.
【在 y******8 的大作中提到】 : Easy. Science is never meant to be big. Otherwise, it is called engineering. : And engineering people are usually better paid. : : can
q*5
50 楼
中国人牛啊
b*y
51 楼
At least, there will be less discrimination on papers from China, which is a good news for dedicated Chinese scientists.
那是 1st author later 一海龟 从此和NCS 绝缘的一箩筐呢 尤其是不做mouse human plant 等KO type的 i.e. OUYANG QI //ctb.pku.edu.cn/main/en/people/people-faculty-ouyangqi.htm without any CNS paper either 1st/corresponding author //www.nature.com/nature/journal/v379/n6561/abs/379143a0.html his PD nature paper corresponding author: Jean-Marc Flesselles PhD //en.scientificcommons.org/jean-marc_flesselles 2004 retired already. //www.saint-gobain-recherche.fr/fr/