Although more info regarding your experiments is needed, but basically,
1. it is possible that WT hes1 activated promoter but dnHes1 (dominant
negative?) did not; it only suggests that the endogenous Hes1 in the cell
line you tested was not invoved in maintaining the basal activity of that
promoter. Actually, it is not a bad observation; it suggests that hes1
activated this promoter via DNA binding, becaseu usually dnHes should have
no or little DNA binding activity.
2. However, if you test both Wt and dnHes1 on the promoter activity,
probably you will see the inhibition of dnHes1 on Wt hes1 function, but you
need to do dose-response curve.
3. you found a very conserved hes bidning element in that promoter by using
information tools, but that does not mean that Hes1 will bind it; you need
to provide the evidence showing that hes1 binds to it in both vivo and vitro
. Also, if you want to show that potential binding element was critical for
Hes1 to activate this promoter, you need to do mutagenesis studies.