This makes one wonder how many more papers in CNS are actually junk but will never be found out.
l*1
13 楼
wet bio fields if WB figure used high contaction those CNS also N sister if IF higher than 20.0 might be >1/3 there are fasle result/s. >1/10 could be retracted within one or two decade. ..
will
【在 H****N 的大作中提到】 : This makes one wonder how many more papers in CNS are actually junk but will : never be found out.
l*1
14 楼
that lab Cell paper major Erratum also, web link: http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/11/06/nature-yanks-co HTTP://download.cell.com/pdf/PIIS0092867413005308.pdf?intermedi then those cited above Cell paper 319 times those papers when do their Errata ?
A*y
15 楼
That's right, it turn out high impact paper in lower IF jounrals have best reproducibility. If I remember correctly is above 70% by someone completely independent.
if decade.
【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】 : wet bio fields if WB figure used high contaction those CNS also N sister if : IF higher than : 20.0 might be >1/3 : there are fasle result/s. >1/10 could be retracted within one or two decade. : .. : : will