G*G
2 楼
reviewer said, "potentially highly dangerous" is not a scientific language.
Could someone help me correct it?
Could someone help me correct it?
i*s
4 楼
My guess is that the reviewer probably had two problems: (1) "potentially"
and "highly" cannot be used in such a way, so changing the structure of the
sentence to something like "it has the potential to be highly dangerous"
should be better; (2) "dangerous" is too vague and also a word not typically
used in scientific writing. The reviewer is probably asking for using a
more specific and accurate word that is more commonly used.
and "highly" cannot be used in such a way, so changing the structure of the
sentence to something like "it has the potential to be highly dangerous"
should be better; (2) "dangerous" is too vague and also a word not typically
used in scientific writing. The reviewer is probably asking for using a
more specific and accurate word that is more commonly used.
h*i
5 楼
也该搞个第一夫人的
A*7
8 楼
bio-research 里, 特别是写scientific papers....几乎没有highly dangerous 这类
说法:
我们lab 也做很多的药物test...看过我老板, 一个老美特别长于写fund application
的主如何用词:
“adverse effects of drug xxx... ” 这样不就“顺眼温和”多了。。。
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】
: reviewer said, "potentially highly dangerous" is not a scientific language.
: Could someone help me correct it?
说法:
我们lab 也做很多的药物test...看过我老板, 一个老美特别长于写fund application
的主如何用词:
“adverse effects of drug xxx... ” 这样不就“顺眼温和”多了。。。
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】
: reviewer said, "potentially highly dangerous" is not a scientific language.
: Could someone help me correct it?
相关阅读
crispr2016已经发了239篇批判ngAgo的文章了关于实验室移液器和仪器设备qvalueTwo research associate positions说起造假,诺奖Linda Buck是最高级吧已经给<自然.生物技术>的主编发信了CAS9能切的DNA片断最短多长?在买买提讨论韩春雨事件毫无意义澳洲实验室NgAgo的最新进展方舟子是福建人的代表吧?有没有这可能:NgAgo37度没活性,而在PCR时切DNA?春秋战国时期,人类是如何生火的?韩文到底有没有被重复?澳大利亚人测序已出骗子的一个通病希望大家能够对同胞更宽容一些(NgAGO说开)Liver Therapy Won the Nobel Prize in 1934韩春雨如果上了长江学者就基本可靠了韩春雨死不承认,别人也没办法吧?关于韩春雨是否造假,个人看法