f*e
2 楼
一个96年的房子,Seller disclosure上说:
previous treatment for termites on 4/8/11,
但是Seller对:
active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
previous termites or other insects damage repair,
termites or other insects damage needing repair
都说是没有.
大家觉得有白蚁的可能性大吗? 还是老一些的房子都需要定时做这种termites
treatment来防止白蚁?
previous treatment for termites on 4/8/11,
但是Seller对:
active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
previous termites or other insects damage repair,
termites or other insects damage needing repair
都说是没有.
大家觉得有白蚁的可能性大吗? 还是老一些的房子都需要定时做这种termites
treatment来防止白蚁?
z*e
3 楼
本来店里10几个,卖了一个月一直没缺货过,前几天被人捅到sd上,马上就卖光了
M*P
4 楼
https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
open peer review a few years ago, but the option wasn't popular.
Instead, it says that multiple surveys have indicated that double-blind
review would be a popular option, though it notes that tests at Nature
Geoscience and Nature Climate Change have had lower uptake than expected
based on such survey results. Still, Nature notes that the responses from
the authors who took that route has been positive, and it has detected no
difference in review quality.
It adds that making manuscripts anonymous will be the responsibility of the
authors and that in some small fields, true anonymity may not be possible.
Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
open peer review a few years ago, but the option wasn't popular.
Instead, it says that multiple surveys have indicated that double-blind
review would be a popular option, though it notes that tests at Nature
Geoscience and Nature Climate Change have had lower uptake than expected
based on such survey results. Still, Nature notes that the responses from
the authors who took that route has been positive, and it has detected no
difference in review quality.
It adds that making manuscripts anonymous will be the responsibility of the
authors and that in some small fields, true anonymity may not be possible.
C*E
5 楼
一般是菜油。其实无所谓,当不着您能喜欢掺着橄榄味儿的辣油。。。
呵呵
呵呵
l*a
6 楼
有可能是这个地区的房子都需要做白蚁预防。
【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: 一个96年的房子,Seller disclosure上说:
: previous treatment for termites on 4/8/11,
: 但是Seller对:
: active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
: previous termites or other insects damage repair,
: termites or other insects damage needing repair
: 都说是没有.
: 大家觉得有白蚁的可能性大吗? 还是老一些的房子都需要定时做这种termites
: treatment来防止白蚁?
【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: 一个96年的房子,Seller disclosure上说:
: previous treatment for termites on 4/8/11,
: 但是Seller对:
: active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
: previous termites or other insects damage repair,
: termites or other insects damage needing repair
: 都说是没有.
: 大家觉得有白蚁的可能性大吗? 还是老一些的房子都需要定时做这种termites
: treatment来防止白蚁?
j*n
8 楼
不知道效果如何
尤其是对大牛实验室的 看文风/参考文献就能猜出来
reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
尤其是对大牛实验室的 看文风/参考文献就能猜出来
reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
n*l
9 楼
红油是取调料的香味,油本身味道淡比较好
l*y
12 楼
把reviewer的意见跟paper一起发表,是不是公正一眼就能看出来
embo journal已经这么干了
reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
embo journal已经这么干了
reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
f*e
16 楼
active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
previous termites or other insects damage repair,
termites or other insects damage needing repair
这三项都选了no
previous treatment for termites
选了yes,有一个说明说是4/8做的treatment.
【在 l******a 的大作中提到】
: seller's disclosure上面这几项都是打no?
: 我遇到一个有过白蚁问题的房子有把处理的时间和公司名称都写出来了,曾经有过问题
: 这项是选了yes。这个做inspection的时候白蚁问题也是可以检查出来的。
previous termites or other insects damage repair,
termites or other insects damage needing repair
这三项都选了no
previous treatment for termites
选了yes,有一个说明说是4/8做的treatment.
【在 l******a 的大作中提到】
: seller's disclosure上面这几项都是打no?
: 我遇到一个有过白蚁问题的房子有把处理的时间和公司名称都写出来了,曾经有过问题
: 这项是选了yes。这个做inspection的时候白蚁问题也是可以检查出来的。
l*a
19 楼
那可能因为要卖房子,先做了白蚁预防。反正如果有过白蚁,inspectation能看得出来
的,不用太担心。
【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
: previous termites or other insects damage repair,
: termites or other insects damage needing repair
: 这三项都选了no
: previous treatment for termites
: 选了yes,有一个说明说是4/8做的treatment.
的,不用太担心。
【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
: previous termites or other insects damage repair,
: termites or other insects damage needing repair
: 这三项都选了no
: previous treatment for termites
: 选了yes,有一个说明说是4/8做的treatment.
s*y
23 楼
这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
v*m
27 楼
完全可以doubleblind review,有结果后double open出版。大家都爽快些。
reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
c*u
29 楼
reviewer 看人下菜,这个也许可以解决。但是最重要的是编辑看人下菜啊。 我知道的
大牛,直接给编辑施压,reviewer的意见根本不take, 直接接受。
大牛,直接给编辑施压,reviewer的意见根本不take, 直接接受。
i*0
30 楼
这种情况就导致以后大家不骂reviewer开始骂编辑了。
好多好文章都是因为老板不在圈子里面,不够牛,直接过不了editor这一关。
而且nature这样做,应该会控制送审的数量,来达到一样对大牛献媚的目的。
好多好文章都是因为老板不在圈子里面,不够牛,直接过不了editor这一关。
而且nature这样做,应该会控制送审的数量,来达到一样对大牛献媚的目的。
q*g
33 楼
昨天听BMC MEDICINE的编辑说,80%的文章是被编辑据掉的。剩下的20%里,只有10%被
据掉。 可见编辑的作用有多大,特别是那些好的杂志,每年收到的投稿那么多,编辑
要选择哪些送出去review,大牛的名字肯定是考虑因素之一。
据掉。 可见编辑的作用有多大,特别是那些好的杂志,每年收到的投稿那么多,编辑
要选择哪些送出去review,大牛的名字肯定是考虑因素之一。
相关阅读
哪个公司的platinum taq便宜好用啊?我快疯了!!!!急求一篇paper (Sci Signal)!恳请推荐生物信息学位置老板不给推荐信,有可能找到博后位置不?据说是乙肝受体文章co-1st严同学的另一半写的双黄包子求最新出炉的Nature Communications文章2片孔晓飞—乙肝受体的发现: The best or one of the best?大家回国找工作挑地方么?北京还是上海?面试一周后无消息,招聘公司又重新贴招聘广告求一篇文献paper究竟什么样才算top研究生?做报告的时候ppt里自己的paper需要加引用吗Ing Direct checking account免费送50刀, 赶紧申请哈佛和mit的生物千老好多转行的啊说说fresh phd现在回国的形势吧Which company's Taq polymerase is good to amplify 10Kb DNA? Thanks.急求2篇paper!need buy BIO-RAD parts求助:请牛人指点 Chip-Seq !!!