paper help, thank you# Chemistry - 化学
d*i
1 楼
大家是怎样感觉的呢。我发现时间都花在备课上，没多少时间看paper,写paper...当然
，我还没有正式上班，下学期是我第一次讲课。
大家第一学期就把grant递出去了吗?一般一学年递几个grant啊？
谢谢大家!
，我还没有正式上班，下学期是我第一次讲课。
大家第一学期就把grant递出去了吗?一般一学年递几个grant啊？
谢谢大家!
s*g
2 楼
请问，我opt五月底到期，老公是大学不占名额的h1，请问我转h4容易吗？需要找律师
吗？需要加急吗？
谢谢帮助！
吗？需要加急吗？
谢谢帮助！
w*y
3 楼
http://taxes.about.com/od/preparingyourtaxes/a/TDF90221.htm
从没FILE过这个FORM， 是不是就意味着所有海外存款都得交税了？
从没FILE过这个FORM， 是不是就意味着所有海外存款都得交税了？
T*k
4 楼
2010 ELECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM
NOVEMBER 3, 2010
by Jason Marczak
With control of the U.S. House of Representatives switching to the
Republican Party, the future of a comprehensive approach to
immigration reform is now in greater doubt. And Democrats—unable to
put forward a proposal that could muster the necessary support to
right our broken immigration system—will take a back seat to the
immigration plans of the new House leadership.
One of the first orders of business when the new Congress convenes in
January will be the designation of new committee chairpersons. Rep.
Zoe Lofgren (CA) is out as the House immigration subcommittee
chairperson, and Rep. Steve King (IA) will likely take the gavel. As
for the full Judiciary Committee, it will likely be led by Rep. Lamar
Smith (TX). This means a new approach for immigration-related issues.
And in essence, going back to the drawing board on many of the core
concerns.
The Democrats had been working on comprehensive immigration reform
that revolved around four pillars originally put forward by Senators
Schumer and Graham in March. (That is before Sen. Graham withdrew his
support a few months later.) The approach included: requiring
biometric Social Security cards; beefing up border security; creating
a system for admitting temporary workers; and implementing a path for
the legalization of certain undocumented immigrants. And President
Obama asserted that the chance for reform was close, noting last week:
“Right now on immigration reform, we’re eight votes short or 10 votes
short.”
But if the Pledge to America—the Republicans’ legislative agenda
unveiled in September—is any indication, the new House leadership’s
immigration focus will be on issues of border enforcement, immigration
law enforcement and strengthening visa security. Plans do not include
any focus on creating a path toward legalization of the 11 million
undocumented immigrants currently living in the shadows. Instead, the
21-page pledge indirectly calls for supporting legislation such as
Arizona’s SB 1070 with its call to “reaffirm the authority of state
and local law enforcement to assist in the enforcement of all federal
immigration laws.”
(On a side, this is welcome news to the Secretary of State-elect of
Kansas, Kris Kobach, who has made a name for himself by drafting anti-
immigrant laws around the country including SB 1070, and is now moving
from law professor to elected office.)
As chairperson, Mr. King favors a piecemeal approach to reforming
immigration, with as similar to the Pledge to America, an initial
focus on strictly border security. He also recently called for re-
interpreting the 14th Amendment—the amendment that gave all African-
Americans citizenship in 1868—in order to end what he termed the
“‘anchor baby’ industry” where undocumented immigrants have children
“so that they can have uninhibited access to taxpayer funded benefits
and to citizenship for as many family members as possible.” The
problem here: there is no such industry and this type of rhetoric only
serves to spark further divisions in a society that is desperately
looking for common ground.
Rep. Lamar Smith (TX), the likely new chairman of the Judiciary
Committee, has also said that he wants to first focus on border
security. But with immigration being a caucus-wide issue, there is no
doubt that Rep. John Boehner, as the soon-to-be Speaker of the House,
will also play a large role in shaping the House’s direction on the
issue.
Either way, after picking up at least 61 seats, the Republican Party
will take control of the House with a focus on putting forward
legislation that focuses on the economy and job creation. Immigration
will not be one of the immediate top priorities. And with the Senate
still controlled by the Democratic Party, finding compromise in the
next two years will be that much more difficult especially as the
presidential jockeying will begin even earlier than in previous races.
Unfortunately, in this political environment, working together and
compromising on issues like immigration reform do not bode well for
each party’s desire to grandstand on core electoral concerns.
The best short-term chance for fixing elements of our immigration
system is likely to come in the next month. Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid (re-elected by 5 percentage points) has pledged to bring up
the Dream Act in the lame-duck session of Congress before it adjourns
for the year. Yes, his statement may have been part of his bid to
rally Latino support for his tight re-election race, but he has now
committed to the issue. The Dream Act should be passed and hopefully
Senators from both parties are willing to support it now that the
campaign is over. If passed, the conditional legal status would be
granted to undocumented immigrant students who arrived before age 16,
have been in the U.S. for at least five years, graduate from a U.S.
high school, and complete two years of college or military service.
In our bid to compete for global jobs, the Dream Act would do the
right thing in allowing motivated children to contribute as much as
possible to the U.S. economy and not be punished for a situation that
they didn’t create.
Now, let’s only hope that a possible rational approach to the Dream
Act is carried forward in how our new Congress addresses broader
immigration issues.
*Jason Marczak is a contributing blogger to AmericasQuarterly.org. He
is senior editor of Americas Quarterly, managing editor of
AmericasQuarterly.org and director of policy at the Americas Society
and Council of the Americas.
Tags:: Immigration Reform, U.S. Congress
NOVEMBER 3, 2010
by Jason Marczak
With control of the U.S. House of Representatives switching to the
Republican Party, the future of a comprehensive approach to
immigration reform is now in greater doubt. And Democrats—unable to
put forward a proposal that could muster the necessary support to
right our broken immigration system—will take a back seat to the
immigration plans of the new House leadership.
One of the first orders of business when the new Congress convenes in
January will be the designation of new committee chairpersons. Rep.
Zoe Lofgren (CA) is out as the House immigration subcommittee
chairperson, and Rep. Steve King (IA) will likely take the gavel. As
for the full Judiciary Committee, it will likely be led by Rep. Lamar
Smith (TX). This means a new approach for immigration-related issues.
And in essence, going back to the drawing board on many of the core
concerns.
The Democrats had been working on comprehensive immigration reform
that revolved around four pillars originally put forward by Senators
Schumer and Graham in March. (That is before Sen. Graham withdrew his
support a few months later.) The approach included: requiring
biometric Social Security cards; beefing up border security; creating
a system for admitting temporary workers; and implementing a path for
the legalization of certain undocumented immigrants. And President
Obama asserted that the chance for reform was close, noting last week:
“Right now on immigration reform, we’re eight votes short or 10 votes
short.”
But if the Pledge to America—the Republicans’ legislative agenda
unveiled in September—is any indication, the new House leadership’s
immigration focus will be on issues of border enforcement, immigration
law enforcement and strengthening visa security. Plans do not include
any focus on creating a path toward legalization of the 11 million
undocumented immigrants currently living in the shadows. Instead, the
21-page pledge indirectly calls for supporting legislation such as
Arizona’s SB 1070 with its call to “reaffirm the authority of state
and local law enforcement to assist in the enforcement of all federal
immigration laws.”
(On a side, this is welcome news to the Secretary of State-elect of
Kansas, Kris Kobach, who has made a name for himself by drafting anti-
immigrant laws around the country including SB 1070, and is now moving
from law professor to elected office.)
As chairperson, Mr. King favors a piecemeal approach to reforming
immigration, with as similar to the Pledge to America, an initial
focus on strictly border security. He also recently called for re-
interpreting the 14th Amendment—the amendment that gave all African-
Americans citizenship in 1868—in order to end what he termed the
“‘anchor baby’ industry” where undocumented immigrants have children
“so that they can have uninhibited access to taxpayer funded benefits
and to citizenship for as many family members as possible.” The
problem here: there is no such industry and this type of rhetoric only
serves to spark further divisions in a society that is desperately
looking for common ground.
Rep. Lamar Smith (TX), the likely new chairman of the Judiciary
Committee, has also said that he wants to first focus on border
security. But with immigration being a caucus-wide issue, there is no
doubt that Rep. John Boehner, as the soon-to-be Speaker of the House,
will also play a large role in shaping the House’s direction on the
issue.
Either way, after picking up at least 61 seats, the Republican Party
will take control of the House with a focus on putting forward
legislation that focuses on the economy and job creation. Immigration
will not be one of the immediate top priorities. And with the Senate
still controlled by the Democratic Party, finding compromise in the
next two years will be that much more difficult especially as the
presidential jockeying will begin even earlier than in previous races.
Unfortunately, in this political environment, working together and
compromising on issues like immigration reform do not bode well for
each party’s desire to grandstand on core electoral concerns.
The best short-term chance for fixing elements of our immigration
system is likely to come in the next month. Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid (re-elected by 5 percentage points) has pledged to bring up
the Dream Act in the lame-duck session of Congress before it adjourns
for the year. Yes, his statement may have been part of his bid to
rally Latino support for his tight re-election race, but he has now
committed to the issue. The Dream Act should be passed and hopefully
Senators from both parties are willing to support it now that the
campaign is over. If passed, the conditional legal status would be
granted to undocumented immigrant students who arrived before age 16,
have been in the U.S. for at least five years, graduate from a U.S.
high school, and complete two years of college or military service.
In our bid to compete for global jobs, the Dream Act would do the
right thing in allowing motivated children to contribute as much as
possible to the U.S. economy and not be punished for a situation that
they didn’t create.
Now, let’s only hope that a possible rational approach to the Dream
Act is carried forward in how our new Congress addresses broader
immigration issues.
*Jason Marczak is a contributing blogger to AmericasQuarterly.org. He
is senior editor of Americas Quarterly, managing editor of
AmericasQuarterly.org and director of policy at the Americas Society
and Council of the Americas.
Tags:: Immigration Reform, U.S. Congress
k*t
5 楼
高中畢業
作於一九八一年秋
明月傾渲禹域前，
菊香滿目勢嬋娟。
有心忙亂乾坤業，
無意迷癡亙古天。
黃鵠微翩過萬水，
北鯤略動躍仟田。
南冥且適鳩鴟遠，
再會中秋憶舊禪。
作於一九八一年秋
明月傾渲禹域前，
菊香滿目勢嬋娟。
有心忙亂乾坤業，
無意迷癡亙古天。
黃鵠微翩過萬水，
北鯤略動躍仟田。
南冥且適鳩鴟遠，
再會中秋憶舊禪。
h*r
6 楼
初来乍到，不太明白
多谢！
多谢！
T*2
7 楼
COMPANY: ZTE（中兴）
position：Financial Analyst/financial manager
duty:be able to analyze risk and help them determinetheir margins on a
variety of projects.it's better that you have experience of project
accounting.
company do not sponsor H1B, they do request experience, if you think you are
qualify and want details about this position, please contact Chuck
Szajkovics,c***[email protected] ,847-548-8710.
pls tell chuck u got this information from catherine tang,because this guy
does not know mitbbs.
good luck XDJMs
CATHERINE
position：Financial Analyst/financial manager
duty:be able to analyze risk and help them determinetheir margins on a
variety of projects.it's better that you have experience of project
accounting.
company do not sponsor H1B, they do request experience, if you think you are
qualify and want details about this position, please contact Chuck
Szajkovics,c***[email protected] ,847-548-8710.
pls tell chuck u got this information from catherine tang,because this guy
does not know mitbbs.
good luck XDJMs
CATHERINE
w*g
8 楼
doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.045
Cure kinetics of vapor grown carbon nanofiber (VGCNF) modified epoxy resin suspensions and fracture toughness of their resulting nanocomposites
Materials Chemistry and Physics
Article in Press, Corrected Proof - Note to users
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TX4-4X4XGFB-2&_user=158225&_coverDate=09%2F03%2F2009&_rdoc=6&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%235580%239999%23999999999%2399999%23FLA%23display%23Articles%29&_c
Cure kinetics of vapor grown carbon nanofiber (VGCNF) modified epoxy resin suspensions and fracture toughness of their resulting nanocomposites
Materials Chemistry and Physics
Article in Press, Corrected Proof - Note to users
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TX4-4X4XGFB-2&_user=158225&_coverDate=09%2F03%2F2009&_rdoc=6&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%235580%239999%23999999999%2399999%23FLA%23display%23Articles%29&_c
q*n
9 楼
the earlier the better. As many as possible.
t*t
10 楼
转h4容易吗？容易。
需要找律师吗？需要加急吗？如果经济不是特别紧的话。
个人经历opt->h4.当时时间紧，没有找律师，但是加急了。很快批下来了。
需要找律师吗？需要加急吗？如果经济不是特别紧的话。
个人经历opt->h4.当时时间紧，没有找律师，但是加急了。很快批下来了。
s*g
11 楼
Good boy.
Foreign accounts and assets. As if U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts and
assets did not already have enough cause for confusion regarding the filing
requirements for Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial
Accounts (FBAR), FATCA now imposes a second filing requirement on them.
Section 511 of FATCA creates new IRC § 6038D, which requires U.S. taxpayers
with foreign accounts and assets with an aggregate value exceeding $50,000
to report them on an informational return. It is unclear whether the $50,000
threshold applies if the balance of foreign accounts and assets exceeds $50
,000 at the end of the tax year or at any time during the tax year, as in
the case of the FBAR $10,000 requirement. FATCA’s provisions of IRC §
6038D apply to assets held during tax years beginning after March 18, 2010.
The new reporting requirement is much broader than the FBAR, so individuals
who do not have an FBAR filing obligation may be subject to the new
reporting requirement. For example, FATCA requires taxpayers with
investments in foreign entities, such as foreign hedge funds and private
equity funds, to report these investments. The FBAR regulations issued by
FinCEN on Feb. 26, 2010, exempt these assets from FBAR reporting.
The minimum penalty for failing to submit the required disclosure is $10,000
, and it increases by $10,000 for each 30-day period following notification
from the Treasury Department, with a maximum penalty of $50,000. There is,
however, a 90-day grace period following notification from the Treasury
before the additional $10,000 penalties accrue (section 6038D(d)). This is
similar to the penalty for failure to file Form 5471, Information Return of
U.S. Persons With Respect To Certain Foreign Corporations, and Form 3520,
Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of
Certain Foreign Gifts. As with those forms, the penalty may be waived if the
taxpayer is able to demonstrate the failure to file was due to reasonable
cause. It is important to realize that taxpayers who have this disclosure
requirement will likely also have an FBAR filing requirement. While the
penalty for failure to file the FBAR is much harsher than the penalty under
section 6038D, both of these penalties will be assessed.
Interestingly, there is a presumption that a taxpayer with “specified
foreign financial assets” has a filing obligation for purposes of the
penalty if the IRS believes the taxpayer has an interest in one or more such
assets and the taxpayer does not provide sufficient information to
demonstrate the aggregate value is less than $50,000 (section 6038D(e)).
【在 w*****y 的大作中提到】
: http://taxes.about.com/od/preparingyourtaxes/a/TDF90221.htm
: 从没FILE过这个FORM， 是不是就意味着所有海外存款都得交税了？
Foreign accounts and assets. As if U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts and
assets did not already have enough cause for confusion regarding the filing
requirements for Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial
Accounts (FBAR), FATCA now imposes a second filing requirement on them.
Section 511 of FATCA creates new IRC § 6038D, which requires U.S. taxpayers
with foreign accounts and assets with an aggregate value exceeding $50,000
to report them on an informational return. It is unclear whether the $50,000
threshold applies if the balance of foreign accounts and assets exceeds $50
,000 at the end of the tax year or at any time during the tax year, as in
the case of the FBAR $10,000 requirement. FATCA’s provisions of IRC §
6038D apply to assets held during tax years beginning after March 18, 2010.
The new reporting requirement is much broader than the FBAR, so individuals
who do not have an FBAR filing obligation may be subject to the new
reporting requirement. For example, FATCA requires taxpayers with
investments in foreign entities, such as foreign hedge funds and private
equity funds, to report these investments. The FBAR regulations issued by
FinCEN on Feb. 26, 2010, exempt these assets from FBAR reporting.
The minimum penalty for failing to submit the required disclosure is $10,000
, and it increases by $10,000 for each 30-day period following notification
from the Treasury Department, with a maximum penalty of $50,000. There is,
however, a 90-day grace period following notification from the Treasury
before the additional $10,000 penalties accrue (section 6038D(d)). This is
similar to the penalty for failure to file Form 5471, Information Return of
U.S. Persons With Respect To Certain Foreign Corporations, and Form 3520,
Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of
Certain Foreign Gifts. As with those forms, the penalty may be waived if the
taxpayer is able to demonstrate the failure to file was due to reasonable
cause. It is important to realize that taxpayers who have this disclosure
requirement will likely also have an FBAR filing requirement. While the
penalty for failure to file the FBAR is much harsher than the penalty under
section 6038D, both of these penalties will be assessed.
Interestingly, there is a presumption that a taxpayer with “specified
foreign financial assets” has a filing obligation for purposes of the
penalty if the IRS believes the taxpayer has an interest in one or more such
assets and the taxpayer does not provide sufficient information to
demonstrate the aggregate value is less than $50,000 (section 6038D(e)).
【在 w*****y 的大作中提到】
: http://taxes.about.com/od/preparingyourtaxes/a/TDF90221.htm
: 从没FILE过这个FORM， 是不是就意味着所有海外存款都得交税了？
S*r
12 楼
Tshark quote Bible绝对是最牛的
唉 不出奇了 好在至少老墨不会冲到我们前面去了
唉 不出奇了 好在至少老墨不会冲到我们前面去了
b*e
13 楼
生命在于折腾
【在 h******r 的大作中提到】
: 初来乍到，不太明白
: 多谢！
【在 h******r 的大作中提到】
: 初来乍到，不太明白
: 多谢！
y*9
14 楼
Thanks for sharing! Any entry level positions to share?
w*u
16 楼
偶有同样感觉。。。。 不知道是不是professor们都很牛，不需要怎么准备就可以讲了
。。。。不过同样的课教第二次，就会好很多。。。
。。。。不过同样的课教第二次，就会好很多。。。
s*g
17 楼
谢谢你的回复！
【在 t**********t 的大作中提到】
: 转h4容易吗？容易。
: 需要找律师吗？需要加急吗？如果经济不是特别紧的话。
: 个人经历opt->h4.当时时间紧，没有找律师，但是加急了。很快批下来了。
【在 t**********t 的大作中提到】
: 转h4容易吗？容易。
: 需要找律师吗？需要加急吗？如果经济不是特别紧的话。
: 个人经历opt->h4.当时时间紧，没有找律师，但是加急了。很快批下来了。
w*y
18 楼
有5万存款的估计也不少吧，怎么以前从来没看到过这个
and
filing
taxpayers
000
000
50
【在 s******g 的大作中提到】
: Good boy.
: Foreign accounts and assets. As if U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts and
: assets did not already have enough cause for confusion regarding the filing
: requirements for Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial
: Accounts (FBAR), FATCA now imposes a second filing requirement on them.
: Section 511 of FATCA creates new IRC § 6038D, which requires U.S. taxpayers
: with foreign accounts and assets with an aggregate value exceeding $50,000
: to report them on an informational return. It is unclear whether the $50,000
: threshold applies if the balance of foreign accounts and assets exceeds $50
: ,000 at the end of the tax year or at any time during the tax year, as in
and
filing
taxpayers
000
000
50
【在 s******g 的大作中提到】
: Good boy.
: Foreign accounts and assets. As if U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts and
: assets did not already have enough cause for confusion regarding the filing
: requirements for Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial
: Accounts (FBAR), FATCA now imposes a second filing requirement on them.
: Section 511 of FATCA creates new IRC § 6038D, which requires U.S. taxpayers
: with foreign accounts and assets with an aggregate value exceeding $50,000
: to report them on an informational return. It is unclear whether the $50,000
: threshold applies if the balance of foreign accounts and assets exceeds $50
: ,000 at the end of the tax year or at any time during the tax year, as in
d*p
19 楼
民主党重来就只是要latinos的选票，对职业移民只有坏处，比如dream act......共和
党有财团在背后推动，做出steam或者recapture的尝试至少是有可能的，不像民主党全
面控制国会的时候，直接就明说一定要捆绑，"piece meal is impossible"
党有财团在背后推动，做出steam或者recapture的尝试至少是有可能的，不像民主党全
面控制国会的时候，直接就明说一定要捆绑，"piece meal is impossible"
I*y
20 楼
不破就拿不到新地图，新firmware.
【在 h******r 的大作中提到】
: 初来乍到，不太明白
: 多谢！
【在 h******r 的大作中提到】
: 初来乍到，不太明白
: 多谢！
T*2
21 楼
hehe,凡是机会我都会拿上来跟大家SHARE的，有面中的XDJM希望上来报个喜啊
are
【在 T****2 的大作中提到】
: COMPANY: ZTE（中兴）
: position：Financial Analyst/financial manager
: duty:be able to analyze risk and help them determinetheir margins on a
: variety of projects.it's better that you have experience of project
: accounting.
: company do not sponsor H1B, they do request experience, if you think you are
: qualify and want details about this position, please contact Chuck
: Szajkovics,c***[email protected] ,847-548-8710.
: pls tell chuck u got this information from catherine tang,because this guy
: does not know mitbbs.
are
【在 T****2 的大作中提到】
: COMPANY: ZTE（中兴）
: position：Financial Analyst/financial manager
: duty:be able to analyze risk and help them determinetheir margins on a
: variety of projects.it's better that you have experience of project
: accounting.
: company do not sponsor H1B, they do request experience, if you think you are
: qualify and want details about this position, please contact Chuck
: Szajkovics,c***[email protected] ,847-548-8710.
: pls tell chuck u got this information from catherine tang,because this guy
: does not know mitbbs.
j*1
22 楼
其实共和党对职业移民还是更有利一些。
h*r
23 楼
好吧
为啥大家都买Mio C320?因为好破？
有没有别的机型candidate? 貌似C320报街名报的不太好。多谢！
【在 I*****y 的大作中提到】
: 不破就拿不到新地图，新firmware.
为啥大家都买Mio C320?因为好破？
有没有别的机型candidate? 貌似C320报街名报的不太好。多谢！
【在 I*****y 的大作中提到】
: 不破就拿不到新地图，新firmware.
I*y
24 楼
Mio C320上面可以安装多种导航软件，他家自带的不好。
大家都是拿来装Garmin,TomTom的软件用的，还能当PDA，所以啦。
【在 h******r 的大作中提到】
: 好吧
: 为啥大家都买Mio C320?因为好破？
: 有没有别的机型candidate? 貌似C320报街名报的不太好。多谢！
大家都是拿来装Garmin,TomTom的软件用的，还能当PDA，所以啦。
【在 h******r 的大作中提到】
: 好吧
: 为啥大家都买Mio C320?因为好破？
: 有没有别的机型candidate? 貌似C320报街名报的不太好。多谢！
相关阅读
Paper help!今天来到LINKDINE看了一下 很气愤paper help, please-----------------Paper help---------------please down load this paper for me! thanks!求审稿机会--Polymer Coating----------article help------------------------失败者是没有事业可言的招聘博士后paper help一篇用HPLC-MSMS分析一种药物方法文章能在scientific report上发表么？求文献paper help, many thanks!Paper help for Advanced Materials ResearchJournal Impact factor 2015职业选择求建议，先谢谢了请问一些经典化学反应式子里面的反应速率等参数去哪里查啊早毕业给老板免费做博后还是晚毕业？兼职机会for chemistry专业（在读）博士酶动力学的问题:这是什么抑制剂？