求片文章，谢谢； Mechanisms of Development# Biology - 生物学
e*e
1 楼
本地的一个公司有个职位，与我背景比较合适。在网上投了简历，没有反应，然后又打
电话问，没有人接电话。
不知道是不是可以直接去那个公司投简历？或者询问相关的信息？
电话问，没有人接电话。
不知道是不是可以直接去那个公司投简历？或者询问相关的信息？
m*r
2 楼
俺家是山东的，姐姐在安徽。约的都在上海签证。（看来跨区预约和签证也没问题）。
就问了一个问题：去美国干吗？ 然后要了我的所有材料 （护照，签证，工资单，bank
statement）， 看了看，就说 过了过了。真是简单。
就问了一个问题：去美国干吗？ 然后要了我的所有材料 （护照，签证，工资单，bank
statement）， 看了看，就说 过了过了。真是简单。
M*t
3 楼
法案里有这么一段话:
"For fiscal year 2012, 15 percent of the total number of immigrant visas
made
available under section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area
that was not one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under
such section 203(b)."
什么是: "... one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010... "
??
这是说该法案头三年过渡期,85%,90%,90%的总名额只给两个国家?? 这两个国家是怎么
选出来的?
如果你没被选中,那你整个国家当年的可用名额至多将为5.2K (2012), 3.5K (2013), 3
.5K
(2014).
注意这个指所有(EB1+2+3+4+5)的可用名额.(如果EBC没被选中,那对所有人将是一场灾
难.)
总之,这个HR 3012 不是简单地取消CAP世界统排,其中猫腻很多.是否支持应该慎重.
当然,EBC支持反对与否,作用都不大.真正给力的应该是ROW,以及有见地的老美.老墨,老
菲支
不支持对自己影响不大.真正受影响的是ROW. EBC内部有矛盾,主要是因为一半一半:
EB2C
目前不属于ROW,而EB3C则非常接近于ROW.这一点,决定了内部必然打架.既然如此,大家
何不聚力一起来想出个两全其美的修正案呢.
"For fiscal year 2012, 15 percent of the total number of immigrant visas
made
available under section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area
that was not one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under
such section 203(b)."
什么是: "... one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010... "
??
这是说该法案头三年过渡期,85%,90%,90%的总名额只给两个国家?? 这两个国家是怎么
选出来的?
如果你没被选中,那你整个国家当年的可用名额至多将为5.2K (2012), 3.5K (2013), 3
.5K
(2014).
注意这个指所有(EB1+2+3+4+5)的可用名额.(如果EBC没被选中,那对所有人将是一场灾
难.)
总之,这个HR 3012 不是简单地取消CAP世界统排,其中猫腻很多.是否支持应该慎重.
当然,EBC支持反对与否,作用都不大.真正给力的应该是ROW,以及有见地的老美.老墨,老
菲支
不支持对自己影响不大.真正受影响的是ROW. EBC内部有矛盾,主要是因为一半一半:
EB2C
目前不属于ROW,而EB3C则非常接近于ROW.这一点,决定了内部必然打架.既然如此,大家
何不聚力一起来想出个两全其美的修正案呢.
y*h
4 楼
人到中年，烦恼甚多，很多中年朋友都是上有老，下有小，没有闲着的时候，甚至每天
都没时间松口气，我现在也是如此，老人生病，孩子上学，压力大的像五座大山。
没钱是肯定没钱的，这辈子也很难会有积蓄了，能还清贷款就不错了。
房贷是到头，每个月的生活费，几乎都是给了房贷，不管美国或者中国，其实都一样，
房价都很高，有的一拼了，好地方谁都想去，所以房价自然是不会降下来的，美国就连
房租都高的一比，北京现在就是在跟纽约学，所以房租也是暴涨，作为中年人，又不能
携家带口的租房，所以咬牙也要买房，哪国都是如此。
没钱，就会着急挣钱，越着急，越不达目的，所以就会心情烦躁，有时候也想自我安慰
，但是却找不到什么可以安慰自己的事情。
现在也不像是年轻的时候了，对什么都毫无兴趣，这咋整。
都没时间松口气，我现在也是如此，老人生病，孩子上学，压力大的像五座大山。
没钱是肯定没钱的，这辈子也很难会有积蓄了，能还清贷款就不错了。
房贷是到头，每个月的生活费，几乎都是给了房贷，不管美国或者中国，其实都一样，
房价都很高，有的一拼了，好地方谁都想去，所以房价自然是不会降下来的，美国就连
房租都高的一比，北京现在就是在跟纽约学，所以房租也是暴涨，作为中年人，又不能
携家带口的租房，所以咬牙也要买房，哪国都是如此。
没钱，就会着急挣钱，越着急，越不达目的，所以就会心情烦躁，有时候也想自我安慰
，但是却找不到什么可以安慰自己的事情。
现在也不像是年轻的时候了，对什么都毫无兴趣，这咋整。
j*b
5 楼
朋友还有一个月不到就要回国了，她想买台Iphone4S，请问有什么办法购买吗？不要合
约机。
约机。
j*9
6 楼
谢谢了
a*m
7 楼
Mechanisms of Development
Volume 127, Issues 7-8, July-August 2010, Pages 358-370
The interaction between two TGF-β type I receptors plays important roles
in ligand binding, SMAD activation, and gradient formation
Volume 127, Issues 7-8, July-August 2010, Pages 358-370
The interaction between two TGF-β type I receptors plays important roles
in ligand binding, SMAD activation, and gradient formation
l*7
8 楼
Under section 203 (b) ! 仍然必须按照类別allocation priority, then by this
amendment,说了多遍了
amendment,说了多遍了
o*o
9 楼
都差不多，我也有房贷
G*y
10 楼
apple store全价买就是了
y*6
11 楼
htc evo?
m*m
13 楼
两全其美的东西是不存在的:)
其实说白了,那个法案真通过了,国家间的利益矛盾(china vs indian) 大大缩小,类别
之间的矛盾更大了.那个法案就是成就2类牺牲3类的解决老印的问题.
area
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: 法案里有这么一段话:
: "For fiscal year 2012, 15 percent of the total number of immigrant visas
: made
: available under section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
: allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area
: that was not one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
: obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under
: such section 203(b)."
: 什么是: "... one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
: obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010... "
其实说白了,那个法案真通过了,国家间的利益矛盾(china vs indian) 大大缩小,类别
之间的矛盾更大了.那个法案就是成就2类牺牲3类的解决老印的问题.
area
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: 法案里有这么一段话:
: "For fiscal year 2012, 15 percent of the total number of immigrant visas
: made
: available under section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
: allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area
: that was not one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
: obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under
: such section 203(b)."
: 什么是: "... one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
: obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010... "
c*7
14 楼
single income 吧？一个人确实压力很大。
j*b
15 楼
她主要是想买iphone4s
g*g
16 楼
I like Epic. Keyboard is still handy.
a*m
17 楼
3x
M*t
18 楼
it is correct that the allocation proposed in HR 3012 is to be made in each
sub-category.
so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 -
is -
EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
if economy is better, EB2C may benefit more. This is because to EB2, HR 3012
is like to allocate the SO in advance (however, the whole # of visas is the
same); it also makes it a rule that the oversubscribed countries (C&I) will
use the visa # earlier than others even when economy is better.
It can be concluded that HR 3012 is only an interim amendment. Even it were
passed, three years later, the law would change again. It is only a solution
to the EBI problems at this tough economy. (No wonder it is IV that heavily
pushes this reform.)
sub-category.
so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 -
is -
EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
if economy is better, EB2C may benefit more. This is because to EB2, HR 3012
is like to allocate the SO in advance (however, the whole # of visas is the
same); it also makes it a rule that the oversubscribed countries (C&I) will
use the visa # earlier than others even when economy is better.
It can be concluded that HR 3012 is only an interim amendment. Even it were
passed, three years later, the law would change again. It is only a solution
to the EBI problems at this tough economy. (No wonder it is IV that heavily
pushes this reform.)
y*w
19 楼
Google Nexus S 4G
快了。说是 Spring 2011 这都4月了。
【在 j***9 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢了
快了。说是 Spring 2011 这都4月了。
【在 j***9 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢了
D*i
20 楼
How so? 这个数据是怎么得出来的？
另外，为什么说H.R.3012是interim amendment？H.R.3012特地还给出了2012-2014年的过渡性安排，明显人家是希望长期有效吧？
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: it is correct that the allocation proposed in HR 3012 is to be made in each
: sub-category.
: so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 -
: is -
: EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
: this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
: The consequence to EBC23:
: EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
: 2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
: EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
另外，为什么说H.R.3012是interim amendment？H.R.3012特地还给出了2012-2014年的过渡性安排，明显人家是希望长期有效吧？
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: it is correct that the allocation proposed in HR 3012 is to be made in each
: sub-category.
: so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 -
: is -
: EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
: this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
: The consequence to EBC23:
: EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
: 2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
: EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
y*6
21 楼
sure that's good one but not yet release
【在 y*w 的大作中提到】
: Google Nexus S 4G
: 快了。说是 Spring 2011 这都4月了。
【在 y*w 的大作中提到】
: Google Nexus S 4G
: 快了。说是 Spring 2011 这都4月了。
M*t
22 楼
这里关键还是看怎样理解这句话:
"...one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives obtaining
lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under such section
203(b)."
这两个国家到底指谁,
如果从各个类别来定,则EB2里,以2010年为例, 无疑是 C(6505) & I(19961). 而EB3里,
则应是M (77.4K)& C(3676 > P-3651).而烙印则被排除在外?似乎不大可能-IV白忙活了.
如果按全EB类.根据2010年的年报,这两个国家应该指I & C.
至于2011年,是否为C & I 还不知道-年报还未出.
咱可以如此解读,但也可以有其他解读方式.
如果说按DEMAND来在个类别里定这两个国家,则将是 I & P 入选.而EB3C不幸被排除在
外,则2012年只能享有 15% X 40K X 25% = 1.5K 个名额;同理,2013和2014年只有 10%
X 40K X 25% = 1K 个名额.
"...one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives obtaining
lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under such section
203(b)."
这两个国家到底指谁,
如果从各个类别来定,则EB2里,以2010年为例, 无疑是 C(6505) & I(19961). 而EB3里,
则应是M (77.4K)& C(3676 > P-3651).而烙印则被排除在外?似乎不大可能-IV白忙活了.
如果按全EB类.根据2010年的年报,这两个国家应该指I & C.
至于2011年,是否为C & I 还不知道-年报还未出.
咱可以如此解读,但也可以有其他解读方式.
如果说按DEMAND来在个类别里定这两个国家,则将是 I & P 入选.而EB3C不幸被排除在
外,则2012年只能享有 15% X 40K X 25% = 1.5K 个名额;同理,2013和2014年只有 10%
X 40K X 25% = 1K 个名额.
a*n
23 楼
Samsung做的？pass.
【在 y*w 的大作中提到】
: Google Nexus S 4G
: 快了。说是 Spring 2011 这都4月了。
【在 y*w 的大作中提到】
: Google Nexus S 4G
: 快了。说是 Spring 2011 这都4月了。
n*s
24 楼
Then the top two will be always top two as others cannot go over 1.5k and 1k?
section
里,
了.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: 这里关键还是看怎样理解这句话:
: "...one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives obtaining
: lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under such section
: 203(b)."
: 这两个国家到底指谁,
: 如果从各个类别来定,则EB2里,以2010年为例, 无疑是 C(6505) & I(19961). 而EB3里,
: 则应是M (77.4K)& C(3676 > P-3651).而烙印则被排除在外?似乎不大可能-IV白忙活了.
: 如果按全EB类.根据2010年的年报,这两个国家应该指I & C.
: 至于2011年,是否为C & I 还不知道-年报还未出.
: 咱可以如此解读,但也可以有其他解读方式.
section
里,
了.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: 这里关键还是看怎样理解这句话:
: "...one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives obtaining
: lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under such section
: 203(b)."
: 这两个国家到底指谁,
: 如果从各个类别来定,则EB2里,以2010年为例, 无疑是 C(6505) & I(19961). 而EB3里,
: 则应是M (77.4K)& C(3676 > P-3651).而烙印则被排除在外?似乎不大可能-IV白忙活了.
: 如果按全EB类.根据2010年的年报,这两个国家应该指I & C.
: 至于2011年,是否为C & I 还不知道-年报还未出.
: 咱可以如此解读,但也可以有其他解读方式.
h*y
25 楼
这个跟HTC EVO比咋样啊？
【在 y*****6 的大作中提到】
: sure that's good one but not yet release
【在 y*****6 的大作中提到】
: sure that's good one but not yet release
M*t
26 楼
NO,this is only for the first three years.
for 2012, the top two are I & C;
for 2013, it is not clear yet.
...
1k?
【在 n***s 的大作中提到】
: Then the top two will be always top two as others cannot go over 1.5k and 1k?
:
: section
: 里,
: 了.
for 2012, the top two are I & C;
for 2013, it is not clear yet.
...
1k?
【在 n***s 的大作中提到】
: Then the top two will be always top two as others cannot go over 1.5k and 1k?
:
: section
: 里,
: 了.
a*w
27 楼
4G 真的 这么有用吗 每月多交10
M*t
28 楼
法案里有这么一段话:
"For fiscal year 2012, 15 percent of the total number of immigrant visas
made
available under section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area
that was not one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under
such section 203(b)."
什么是: "... one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010... "
??
这是说该法案头三年过渡期,85%,90%,90%的总名额只给两个国家?? 这两个国家是怎么
选出来的?
如果你没被选中,那你整个国家当年的可用名额至多将为5.2K (2012), 3.5K (2013), 3
.5K
(2014).
注意这个指所有(EB1+2+3+4+5)的可用名额.(如果EBC没被选中,那对所有人将是一场灾
难.)
总之,这个HR 3012 不是简单地取消CAP世界统排,其中猫腻很多.是否支持应该慎重.
当然,EBC支持反对与否,作用都不大.真正给力的应该是ROW,以及有见地的老美.老墨,老
菲支
不支持对自己影响不大.真正受影响的是ROW. EBC内部有矛盾,主要是因为一半一半:
EB2C
目前不属于ROW,而EB3C则非常接近于ROW.这一点,决定了内部必然打架.既然如此,大家
何不聚力一起来想出个两全其美的修正案呢.
it is correct that the allocation proposed in HR 3012 is to be made in each
sub-category.
so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 is -
EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
if economy is better, EB2C may benefit more. This is because to EB2, HR 3012
is like to allocate the SO in advance (however, the whole # of visas is the
same); it also makes it a rule that the oversubscribed countries (C&I) will
use the visa # earlier than others even when economy is better.
It can be concluded that HR 3012 is only an interim amendment. Even it were
passed, three years later, the law would change again. It is only a solution
to the EBI problems at this tough economy. (No wonder it is IV that heavily
pushes this reform.)
"For fiscal year 2012, 15 percent of the total number of immigrant visas
made
available under section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area
that was not one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under
such section 203(b)."
什么是: "... one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010... "
??
这是说该法案头三年过渡期,85%,90%,90%的总名额只给两个国家?? 这两个国家是怎么
选出来的?
如果你没被选中,那你整个国家当年的可用名额至多将为5.2K (2012), 3.5K (2013), 3
.5K
(2014).
注意这个指所有(EB1+2+3+4+5)的可用名额.(如果EBC没被选中,那对所有人将是一场灾
难.)
总之,这个HR 3012 不是简单地取消CAP世界统排,其中猫腻很多.是否支持应该慎重.
当然,EBC支持反对与否,作用都不大.真正给力的应该是ROW,以及有见地的老美.老墨,老
菲支
不支持对自己影响不大.真正受影响的是ROW. EBC内部有矛盾,主要是因为一半一半:
EB2C
目前不属于ROW,而EB3C则非常接近于ROW.这一点,决定了内部必然打架.既然如此,大家
何不聚力一起来想出个两全其美的修正案呢.
it is correct that the allocation proposed in HR 3012 is to be made in each
sub-category.
so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 is -
EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
if economy is better, EB2C may benefit more. This is because to EB2, HR 3012
is like to allocate the SO in advance (however, the whole # of visas is the
same); it also makes it a rule that the oversubscribed countries (C&I) will
use the visa # earlier than others even when economy is better.
It can be concluded that HR 3012 is only an interim amendment. Even it were
passed, three years later, the law would change again. It is only a solution
to the EBI problems at this tough economy. (No wonder it is IV that heavily
pushes this reform.)
a*w
29 楼
可是 除了 4G的手机
还真没啥好3G手机了
还真没啥好3G手机了
l*7
30 楼
Under section 203 (b) ! 仍然必须按照类別allocation priority, then by this
amendment,说了多遍了
amendment,说了多遍了
k*e
31 楼
Optimus S
【在 a*******w 的大作中提到】
: 可是 除了 4G的手机
: 还真没啥好3G手机了
【在 a*******w 的大作中提到】
: 可是 除了 4G的手机
: 还真没啥好3G手机了
m*m
32 楼
两全其美的东西是不存在的:)
其实说白了,那个法案真通过了,国家间的利益矛盾(china vs indian) 大大缩小,类别
之间的矛盾更大了.那个法案就是成就2类牺牲3类的解决老印的问题.
area
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: 法案里有这么一段话:
: "For fiscal year 2012, 15 percent of the total number of immigrant visas
: made
: available under section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
: allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area
: that was not one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
: obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under
: such section 203(b)."
: 什么是: "... one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
: obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010... "
其实说白了,那个法案真通过了,国家间的利益矛盾(china vs indian) 大大缩小,类别
之间的矛盾更大了.那个法案就是成就2类牺牲3类的解决老印的问题.
area
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: 法案里有这么一段话:
: "For fiscal year 2012, 15 percent of the total number of immigrant visas
: made
: available under section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
: allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area
: that was not one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
: obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under
: such section 203(b)."
: 什么是: "... one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives
: obtaining lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010... "
c*d
33 楼
我也再等nexus s
【在 y*w 的大作中提到】
: Google Nexus S 4G
: 快了。说是 Spring 2011 这都4月了。
【在 y*w 的大作中提到】
: Google Nexus S 4G
: 快了。说是 Spring 2011 这都4月了。
M*t
34 楼
it is correct that the allocation proposed in HR 3012 is to be made in each
sub-category.
so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 -
is -
EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
if economy is better, EB2C may benefit more. This is because to EB2, HR 3012
is like to allocate the SO in advance (however, the whole # of visas is the
same); it also makes it a rule that the oversubscribed countries (C&I) will
use the visa # earlier than others even when economy is better.
It can be concluded that HR 3012 is only an interim amendment. Even it were
passed, three years later, the law would change again. It is only a solution
to the EBI problems at this tough economy. (No wonder it is IV that heavily
pushes this reform.)
sub-category.
so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 -
is -
EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
if economy is better, EB2C may benefit more. This is because to EB2, HR 3012
is like to allocate the SO in advance (however, the whole # of visas is the
same); it also makes it a rule that the oversubscribed countries (C&I) will
use the visa # earlier than others even when economy is better.
It can be concluded that HR 3012 is only an interim amendment. Even it were
passed, three years later, the law would change again. It is only a solution
to the EBI problems at this tough economy. (No wonder it is IV that heavily
pushes this reform.)
r*0
35 楼
有没有人考虑那个双屏的京瓷echo
D*i
36 楼
How so? 这个数据是怎么得出来的？
另外，为什么说H.R.3012是interim amendment？H.R.3012特地还给出了2012-2014年的过渡性安排，明显人家是希望长期有效吧？
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: it is correct that the allocation proposed in HR 3012 is to be made in each
: sub-category.
: so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 -
: is -
: EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
: this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
: The consequence to EBC23:
: EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
: 2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
: EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
另外，为什么说H.R.3012是interim amendment？H.R.3012特地还给出了2012-2014年的过渡性安排，明显人家是希望长期有效吧？
The consequence to EBC23:
EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: it is correct that the allocation proposed in HR 3012 is to be made in each
: sub-category.
: so, it is quite simple, the purpose of HR 3012 -
: is -
: EB3I wanted to rob the EB3 ROW, since it could not get any SO each year.
: this is the only way to solve the big backlog in EB3I.
: The consequence to EBC23:
: EB3C, annual quote drops from 2500 to 1500 in year 2012, to 1000 in years
: 2013 and 2014. after 2014, all EB3's PD will be the same.
: EB2C, not much difference if economy is still gloomy in foreseeable years.
j*9
37 楼
我也在等...
Google Nexus S 4G
Google Nexus S 4G
M*t
38 楼
这里关键还是看怎样理解这句话:
"...one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives obtaining
lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under such section
203(b)."
这两个国家到底指谁,
如果从各个类别来定,则EB2里,以2010年为例, 无疑是 C(6505) & I(19961). 而EB3里,
则应是M (77.4K)& C(3676 > P-3651).而烙印则被排除在外?似乎不大可能-IV白忙活了.
如果按全EB类.根据2010年的年报,这两个国家应该指I & C.
至于2011年,是否为C & I 还不知道-年报还未出.
咱可以如此解读,但也可以有其他解读方式.
如果说按DEMAND来在个类别里定这两个国家,则将是 I & P 入选.而EB3C不幸被排除在
外,则2012年只能享有 15% X 40K X 25% = 1.5K 个名额;同理,2013和2014年只有 10%
X 40K X 25% = 1K 个名额.
"...one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives obtaining
lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under such section
203(b)."
这两个国家到底指谁,
如果从各个类别来定,则EB2里,以2010年为例, 无疑是 C(6505) & I(19961). 而EB3里,
则应是M (77.4K)& C(3676 > P-3651).而烙印则被排除在外?似乎不大可能-IV白忙活了.
如果按全EB类.根据2010年的年报,这两个国家应该指I & C.
至于2011年,是否为C & I 还不知道-年报还未出.
咱可以如此解读,但也可以有其他解读方式.
如果说按DEMAND来在个类别里定这两个国家,则将是 I & P 入选.而EB3C不幸被排除在
外,则2012年只能享有 15% X 40K X 25% = 1.5K 个名额;同理,2013和2014年只有 10%
X 40K X 25% = 1K 个名额.
n*s
39 楼
Then the top two will be always top two as others cannot go over 1.5k and 1k?
section
里,
了.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: 这里关键还是看怎样理解这句话:
: "...one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives obtaining
: lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under such section
: 203(b)."
: 这两个国家到底指谁,
: 如果从各个类别来定,则EB2里,以2010年为例, 无疑是 C(6505) & I(19961). 而EB3里,
: 则应是M (77.4K)& C(3676 > P-3651).而烙印则被排除在外?似乎不大可能-IV白忙活了.
: 如果按全EB类.根据2010年的年报,这两个国家应该指I & C.
: 至于2011年,是否为C & I 还不知道-年报还未出.
: 咱可以如此解读,但也可以有其他解读方式.
section
里,
了.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: 这里关键还是看怎样理解这句话:
: "...one of the two states with the largest numbers of natives obtaining
: lawful permanent resident status during fiscal year 2010 under such section
: 203(b)."
: 这两个国家到底指谁,
: 如果从各个类别来定,则EB2里,以2010年为例, 无疑是 C(6505) & I(19961). 而EB3里,
: 则应是M (77.4K)& C(3676 > P-3651).而烙印则被排除在外?似乎不大可能-IV白忙活了.
: 如果按全EB类.根据2010年的年报,这两个国家应该指I & C.
: 至于2011年,是否为C & I 还不知道-年报还未出.
: 咱可以如此解读,但也可以有其他解读方式.
M*t
40 楼
NO,this is only for the first three years.
for 2012, the top two are I & C;
for 2013, it is not clear yet.
...
1k?
【在 n***s 的大作中提到】
: Then the top two will be always top two as others cannot go over 1.5k and 1k?
:
: section
: 里,
: 了.
for 2012, the top two are I & C;
for 2013, it is not clear yet.
...
1k?
【在 n***s 的大作中提到】
: Then the top two will be always top two as others cannot go over 1.5k and 1k?
:
: section
: 里,
: 了.
p*a
41 楼
up
z*a
42 楼
这个法案通过的可能性很小，大家就不要积极讨论了，白白浪费我们的感情。
相关阅读
[合集] 老印造假----续考PATENT BAR攻略 (转载)MS in Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining...2009 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine谈谈项目管理paper help, thanks!How to become a professor (I)Future...博士后老张致前妻书June 8更新：我应该和过去博士后的老板争取我的第一作者的利益[合集] mitochondria 大牛请进来[合集] 问个基因克隆的事情 烦了快一年了请问我是否应该海龟生物学实验室与狮群问高手们一个问题科普：搞不清国内生物口拿多少经费合适的请进谁也没我前老板让人绝望端粒和端粒酶的发现历程（图文版）也谈next-generation sequencing technologyMarshall Warren Nirenberg去世了