按照蛋白的domain进行分段 domain两侧保留seven amino acid residues that is enough please refer Simulations with our method indicate that a read length of 20–25 bases is optimal for gene-level expression estimation from mouse and maize RNA-Seq data when sequencing throughput is fixed. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20022975 more answers please go to below BACHELOR THESIS (2011) Evaluation of data from high-throughput sequencing //is.muni.cz/th/323639/prif_b/thesis.pdf and its references.
【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】 : 按照蛋白的domain进行分段 : domain两侧保留seven amino acid residues that is enough : please refer : Simulations with our method indicate that : a read length of 20–25 bases is optimal for gene-level expression : estimation from mouse and maize RNA-Seq data when sequencing : throughput is fixed. : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20022975 : more answers please go to : below BACHELOR THESIS (2011)
l*5
12 楼
NO, 只能用来加强一下CONTRIBUTION
l*1
13 楼
rna-seq 知道是啥吗 不清楚的话 维基一下吧 //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA-Seq RNA-seq, also called "Whole Transcriptome Shotgun Sequencing" [1] ("WTSS") and dubbed "a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics",[2] refers to the use of high-throughput sequencing technologies to sequence cDNA in order to get information about a sample's RNA content, a technique that is quickly becoming invaluable in the study of diseases like cancer.[3] Thanks to the deep coverage and base level resolution provided by next-generation sequencing instruments, RNA-seq provides researchers with efficient ways to measure transcriptome data experimentally, allowing them to get information such as how different alleles of a gene are expressed, detect post- transcriptional mutations or identify gene fusions.[3] here cDNA after its transcription→ amino acids residues of protein. 至于蛋白质的In Silico mapping 2062 AC 以后找到理论了 再assemble吧 啊 就是 In Vitro 还在不断否定前人的见解呢 please go to //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530591 >Surprisingly, there was no detectable homology between PfMyb2 and Cef1 in the PFC0365w/PRP19 binding domains, even though the yeast orthologs of PfMyb2 and PFC0365w also interact. In fact, the only significant homology between Cef1 and PfMyb2 was in the first 233 amino acids that encode the Myb DNA-binding domain motifs (49% identical, 70% similar). This result was unexpected because protein interaction interfaces are generally thought to evolve more slowly, since changing residues in one protein would require compensating changes in the binding partner. The interaction between PfMyb2 and PFC0365w demonstrates that this is not always the case. A similar observation has been made for three pairs of interacting proteins from Caenorhabditis elegans [15]. Despite the lack of homology between PfMyb2 and Cef1 C-terminal to the MYB DNA-binding domain, the fact that PfMyb2 binds to the P. falciparum PRP19 homolog suggests that PfMyb2 is the functional homolog of Cef1. Since Cef1 is primarily involved in RNA splicing, we propose that PfMyb2 functions in a similar manner and is unlikely to act as a transcription factor. ---- ps: if you are satisfied with both replied. BAOZI one please transfer to my mitbbs financial account. WEI-BI 10.
if limited to Methyl transferase, Acetyl transferase, Protein tyrosine phosphatase to perform a structural prediction of the putative ligands. The modelling of the domains takes into account the different ligand orientation when necessary as well as the orientation of the important residues involved in binding. Please go to //adan-embl.ibmc.umh.es/ from //www.embl.de/ and more pls go to //mamba.bio.uci.edu/rt95.06.16/rt_1.html from //www.mcb.harvard.edu/hastings/dino.html