那都21世纪了,澳大利亚这边为何却又要在一些地方实行禁酒令呢?今晚6点,让我们一起在直播间深度学习下这篇文章。 预习任务:(晚上六点前提交)通读整篇文章,并标记出文章中,你不熟悉的单词和短语等语言点(比如加粗或下划线标出)。Dry seasonAustralia re-bans
alcohol in some Aboriginal communitiesProhibition is no
substitute for fixing Aboriginal people’s terrible
social problemsFeb 16th 2023 | ALICE SPRINGSHIGH TEMPERATURESare not all that Alice Springs, a town in Australia’s sun-scorched outback, has to defend itself against. A
crime wave has forced residents to turn their properties into fortresses.
Businesses are battened down with steel bars and cordoned with razor-wire. “It’s been anarchy”,
says Robert Phillips, who owns a café that was broken
into four times before he threw up defences. Last year Alice Springs saw its
highest incidence of “property offences” on record.Though the police do not publish race-based data, members of the
60,000-strong indigenous community are said to be largely responsible for
surging crime in Alice Springs and across Australia’s
self-governed Northern Territory. Over a quarter of the population of the
territory, which includes Alice Springs, are Aboriginal people (compared with
just over 3% of the national population). They are much poorer than other
Australians and more beset by problems associated with criminality, including
alcohol abuse. In 2020 the rate of “alcohol-attributable
hospitalisations” was 20 times higher for indigenous
people in Alice Springs than the national average, according to John Boffa, a
doctor working with the People’s Alcohol Action
Coalition, a community group. One reason for the crime wave is that alcohol,
for many years restricted in the Northern Territory, has become more readily
available there.Most of its remote, indigenous settlements were subject to federal
restrictions on the sale and consumption of booze. These were part of a series
of special measures, also including bans on pornography and compulsory health
checks for Aboriginal children, introduced in 2007, in what was known as the
Northern Territory Intervention. The booze ban expired last July, however, and
alcohol has since flowed through the territory.Many, including Aboriginal groups, had warned against relaxing the ban.
Yet local politicians had found it hard to defend. Natasha Fyles, who leads the
Northern Territory’s Labor government, derided it as “a race-based policy that disempowers”Aboriginal people. The crime wave is now causing a rethink. Earlier this month
an official review led by an Aboriginal bureaucrat found evidence that ending
prohibition had caused “unacceptable levels of harm” and recommended its revival. Ms Fyles has passed
legislation to do that. It will permit remote communities to opt out of the ban
only if they can show a plan to manage alcohol consumption, supported by a
majority of their residents.Many Aboriginal people consider prohibition necessary. It should not be
viewed as discriminatory but as “a protection for the
women and children in those communities”, says John
Paterson, the (Aboriginal) chief executive of the Aboriginal Medical Services
Alliance Northern Territory. Even so, prohibition will not fix the underlying
issues of poverty and marginalisation driving Aboriginal people to drink.Contrary to a persistent myth, their genetic disposition does not make
them more susceptible to alcohol abuse; the conditions in which many live do.
In Alice Springs’ dry riverbed, unemployed groups from
across Australia’s desert interior sleep rough. Surveys
suggest Aboriginal people’s average household income is
around half the Australian average. Almost half of young Aboriginal adults are
not engaged in full-time work or education.The federal Labor government, led by Anthony Albanese, promises to tackle
the problem by spending A$250m ($173m) on Aboriginal social services, including
health care. Such measures are necessary. Like the booze bans, they have
previously had only limited success under previous governments, notes William
Tilmouth, an elder of the Arrernte Aboriginal nation: “Everything
they do is a variation of yesteryear.” Given that as a
child he was seized from his family and placed in a mission in the name of
assimilation, that is a painful indictment. But it is hard to disagree with.
After decades of interventions, the lives of Australia’s
Aboriginal people are getting little better and in some ways worse.■