外媒报道俄乌，为啥配中国阅兵式的图？

2023-04-19 04:04

导读

长期以来，西方的媒体报道充斥着抹黑中国的言论。美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）和《纽约时报》（The New York Times）有关新冠疫情和乌克兰危机的报道充分展示了部分西方媒体是如何“借题发挥”抹黑中国的。《纽约时报》还采用“移花接木”的方式让受众相信中国向俄罗斯提供军援，进而误导受众。本期视频，起底工作室将揭露西方媒体在报道抹黑中国时候的惯用手法，击破所谓“新闻真相”的谎言。

“中国很坏”，这是一些西方媒体在报道中国议题时的核心观点。

美国有线新闻网络（NewsNation）指责中国的起重机可能存在“间谍武器”的嫌疑。

中国提出俄乌冲突“和平方案”，美国国家安全委员会战略沟通协调员约翰·柯比（John Kirby）认为中国提出的方案很糟糕。

“说实话，我们现在并不想停火。”

"Frankly, we don't want to see a ceasefire right now."

美媒对中国没完没了的抨击完美传递了美国对中国的看法。新冠疫情和乌克兰危机展示了这些媒体的恶意言论。

The relentless China bashing in the Western media perfectly sums up how the US views China. COVID and Ukraine crisis are two perfect examples of toxic Western media rhetoric.

偷梁换柱的叙事

偷换概念是西方媒体惯用的伎俩。美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）记者王以文（Selina Wang）显然深谙此道。

在街头采访游客时，画外音将来自武汉的游客描述为“来自疫情源头的游客”。试图将武汉与疫情起源联系起来并非是什么无伤大雅的描述，而是蓄意捏造，营造出中国的负面形象。

In the voiceover, we hear Wang described a tourist as someone from "Wuhan, where the pandemic started". Trying to link Wuhan to the pandemic origin isn't some innocuous description, but a deliberate attempt to hammer in the idea that China is bad.

迄今为止，世界卫生组织（WHO）尚未确定新冠疫情源头，科学界对于疫情源头也没有得出任何结论。同时，此类报道会继续助长美国社会本就十分猖獗的仇外风气。作为一名亚裔美国人，王以文却加入了仇视亚洲人的阵营。

First, WHO reiterates that nothing is certain about the origin of COVID so far. The scientific community has yet to arrive at any conclusion about where the pandemic started.

Second, it feeds into the xenophobia that's already rampant in American society. And Wang joins in the club of Asian haters.

第三，王以文曾抱怨当地人士不会同她这样的外国记者交谈。现在有人欣然接受她的采访，而她却选择诋毁这名受访者的家乡。试问谁又会愿意接受这样的采访呢？

西方媒体通过不停地改写故事从而争夺话语权。

The Western media is rewriting the narrative and competing for discursive power.

美联社记者姜大翼（Dake Kang）的文章充斥着片面的信息和偏向性的结论。

在一条他的个人推特里，姜大翼下结论称中国的防疫措施“从头到尾都错了”。（So, what went wrong? In short, everything.）

但其收集的所谓的“证据”并未能帮助读者理解中国的真实情况。相反，这些所谓的“证据”都只是为了支持他的既定论调——“中国很坏”。

This piece from Dake Kang at AP news is full of one-sided facts and biased conclusions. The pieces of evidence he collected does not help anyone understand the real situation that is happening in China, but instead serves his forgone conclusion: China is bad.

蓄意而为的误导

西方媒体热议的另一个话题则是乌克兰危机。

Another topic continuing to fester in the Western media is the Ukraine crisis.

俄乌冲突加剧，西方不关心如何解决冲突，却造谣中国给俄罗斯提供武器。

《纽约时报》声称，中国向俄罗斯提供了价值超过1200万美元的无人机及配套零件。但事实上，此前坠落黑海美国MQ-9“死神”(MQ-9 Reaper)无人机造价高达3200万美元，1200万的无人机连美国一架MQ-9都比不上。

与此同时，《纽约时报》在报道中采用的配图也耐人寻味。

报道中的配图是一架在北京阅兵式上展示的巨型无人机。通过蓄意误导让读者认为，中国在向俄罗斯提供如图片上的这种无人机。但实际上，两者毫无关系。

Further down the page we see this picture showing a huge drone in a parade in Beijing. That's deliberately misleading, making you believe that Beijing is sending this aircraft to Russia. However, none of the drones showcased in the parade are for sale.

更让人惊讶的是，文章中的所有照片展示的都是乌克兰军队在使用无人机。由于《纽约时报》根本找不到中国向俄罗斯提供无人机的图片，不得不利用移花接木的手法以支持其散播恐慌的言论。

Taking a closer look at the pictures in the article, it is clear to see that all of the photos are showing Ukrainian troops using drones, The New York Times has no photographic evidence of the drones that China has given to Russia, and has to resort to manipulative tactics to support their fear mongering.

文章中引用了一名与中国无人机厂家有明显的利益冲突“专家”——科尔·罗森特雷特（Cole Rosentreter）的言论。他是加拿大无人机制造商“飞马”公司（Pegasus）的首席执行官，也是中国科技公司“大疆”（DJI）的直接竞争者。

One of their quoted "experts" is Cole Rosentreter, a man who has a clear conflict of interest, as he is the chief executive of the Canadian drone maker Pegasus, a direct competitor to the Chinese tech company DJI.