日本排放核污水，日料还能吃吗？

2023-08-01 07:08

导读

据日媒报道，日本计划最早下个月实施核污水排海，罔顾国内民众和国际社会的强烈反对。日本的行为也引发了中国民众的焦虑情绪。在社交媒体上，许多用户表达对日本料理及日本产品安全性的担忧。起底工作室采访了北京居民和日料店的店主，了解他们对日本核污水排海看法以及受到的影响。

日益扩散的担忧

近日，起底工作室观察到，一些用户在大众点评上表达对日本料理的疑虑，担心食材受到核辐射影响。

“我已经发誓不吃海里的鱼了！核废水到处都是，祸害全球，吃陆地上的还凑合。”

“抓紧吃，海水污染了，就得忌口了。”

起底工作室采访了北京居民和外国游客，了解日本核污水排放会如何影响他们的日料消费。

从事金融行业的刘女士表示，自己和家人吃日料海鲜的频率一直在降低。高校学生朱承天认为排污并不会影响自己的消费，食材不会来自于排放海域。也有居民表示自己并没有关注此事或者不吃日料。

Liu, a finance practitioner who declined to give her full name, confirmed she eats Japanese food and seafood less frequently than before. College student Zhu Chengtian denied the possible impact on his consumption, as he believes the ingredients would not come from waters with nuclear water discharge. There were also residents who knew little about the issue or never eat Japanese food.

随后记者探访了北京的一家日料店。店主顾明说，店内并不进口日本食材，而是会选用更安全更优质的其他区域海产品代替。除了一些中老年顾客会问起食材是否来自日本，其他方面没有受到太大的影响。另一位店主聂超恒认为日本核污水排放的影响是蝴蝶效应。虽然目前看不到冲击，但随着时间的推移，裂变还会发生。

7月7日，中国海关总署发布声明，禁止进口日本福岛等十个县（都）食品，对来自日本其他地区的食品，特别是水产品，实施100%查验。这一进口限制最初发布于2011年，日本福岛核泄漏事故一个月后。

On July 7, China's General Administration of Customs (GAC) issued a statement banning the import of food from ten prefectures in Japan, including Fukushima, and implementing 100 percent inspection of food from other parts of Japan, especially aquatic products. This import restriction was initially issued in 2011, one month after the Fukushima nuclear accident.

但民众对核辐射的担心已经从食品安全扩散到了美妆护肤等其他产品上。高校学生姚女士告诉记者，她常使用日本美妆产品，现在有点担心它们的危害，以后会有意识地减少购买。

However, the public concern over nuclear radiation has spread from food security to other products such as cosmetics. Yao, a college student, told our reporter that she uses quite a few Japanese cosmetic products and is now a bit worried about their dangers, and will consciously reduce her consumption in the future.

离谱的“达标报告”

日本大规模排海在即，它拉来了国际原子能机构（IAEA）做背书。7月4日，IAEA发布日本核污水排海达标报告，鉴定日本排放的核污水符合国际标准，“对人类和环境的辐射影响可以忽略不计”。

Japan received endorsement from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as the wastewater discharge approaches. On July 4, the IAEA issued a report on safety review of the "treated water", claiming it to be in conformity with the international agreed standard and will have a "negligible radiological impact on people and the environment".

一位韩国记者在7月4日发布会结束后追着格罗西问道：“你是不是收了日本100万欧元？”

After the press release on July 4, a South Korean reporter chased after IAEA Director General Grossi and asked him: "Did you receive 1 million euros from Japan?"

新闻画面显示，这位记者被格罗西的安保人员拉拽，差点倒地。格罗西高声反驳了记者，但是格罗西并未向在场公众给出相关的解释和证据。

7月10日，日本市民组织和韩国在野党议员组成的反排海团体在日本首相官邸前抗议，坚决反对日本政府及东电将福岛第一核电站核污染水排放入海。

7月11日，中国外交部发言人汪文斌表示：“如果有人认为福岛核污染水可以饮用、可以游泳，我们建议日方把核污染水好好利用起来，供这些人饮用或游泳，而不是排进大海，让国际社会担忧。”

而对于太平洋地区、岛国很多以海为生的人们，核污水排放对生活的打击更会是毁灭性的。琉球和平联盟创始人魏孝昌（Rob Kajiwara）告诉起底工作室，琉球的很多产品都来自于日本本土，经济依赖程度高。“如果我们单纯地选择不再购买这些日本产品，我们该如何生活，如何生存？”

For people in the Pacific island countries and areas, nuclear water discharge could become a fatal strike. Rob Kajiwara, founder of Peace for Okinawa Coalition, said that Luchu's economy heavily depends on mainland Japan where many products come from. "If we just choose to stop buying, how will we live, how will we survive?"