请教：鱼丸肉丸怎么做？# Food - 画饼充饥
b*s
1 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Biology 讨论区 】
发信人: boulders (walnut), 信区: Biology
标 题: 请教eLife投稿
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 4 11:57:13 2014, 美东)
先后被Science和NCB拒了，终于eLife有了稍微好点的消息。主编邀请full submission
。但
是看起来peer review是一个reviewing editor和1，2个reviewers.
“we would be happy to consider your work further for in-depth review by a
Reviewing Editor and one or more additional reviewers. Please note that our
commitment to peer review does not guarantee acceptance. A substantial
number of submissions are rejected after peer review.”
我上次看到有人提到eLife拒稿率也很高。请问这个据稿是包括主编初审吗？full
submission之后通过率有多高呢？这个文章对我现在非常关键。最后几个学校申请就靠
它了，现在晚上觉都睡不踏实:(。
另外我看到full submission里鼓励加入Source data files, for figures and tables
。就是用来做统计分析的原文件。今天就想submit出去，恐怕来不及弄了。这个是
encourage的，不是required，请问有没有过来人说说这个有多必要？
最早投稿我就是一个single PDF，full submission说At this point, authors can
either upload another single PDF of their manuscript (with the text and
figures combined),or.....
我准备还是用上次那个PDF，有没有什么不好？还是upload the source files
separately更好？
谢谢！
发信人: boulders (walnut), 信区: Biology
标 题: 请教eLife投稿
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 4 11:57:13 2014, 美东)
先后被Science和NCB拒了，终于eLife有了稍微好点的消息。主编邀请full submission
。但
是看起来peer review是一个reviewing editor和1，2个reviewers.
“we would be happy to consider your work further for in-depth review by a
Reviewing Editor and one or more additional reviewers. Please note that our
commitment to peer review does not guarantee acceptance. A substantial
number of submissions are rejected after peer review.”
我上次看到有人提到eLife拒稿率也很高。请问这个据稿是包括主编初审吗？full
submission之后通过率有多高呢？这个文章对我现在非常关键。最后几个学校申请就靠
它了，现在晚上觉都睡不踏实:(。
另外我看到full submission里鼓励加入Source data files, for figures and tables
。就是用来做统计分析的原文件。今天就想submit出去，恐怕来不及弄了。这个是
encourage的，不是required，请问有没有过来人说说这个有多必要？
最早投稿我就是一个single PDF，full submission说At this point, authors can
either upload another single PDF of their manuscript (with the text and
figures combined),or.....
我准备还是用上次那个PDF，有没有什么不好？还是upload the source files
separately更好？
谢谢！
